Bhat Swarna R, Meng Nathan F, Kumar Kishore, Nagesh Karthik N, Kawale Ashwini, Bhutani Vinod K
Department of Neonatology, St. John's Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Division of Neonatal-Developmental Medicine, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Jul;100(4):F309-12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306269. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
External thermal support is critical for preterm or ill infants due to altered thermoregulation. Incubators are the gold standard for long-term support and have been adopted successfully in many countries. Alternatives such as radiant warmers, blankets and others are often used as standard of care (SoC) in resource-limited settings when infants are otherwise not in Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC).
In this pilot study, we evaluate the feasibility of a conductive thermal mattress (CTM) using phase change materials as a low-cost warmer. We conducted a prospective multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial to determine non-inferiority of this CTM to SoC warming practices in low birthweight infants. The primary outcome was maintenance of axillary temperature.
We equally randomised 160 infants to CTM or SoC. The latter cohort continued to receive warmth by radiant warmers (n=48), blankets (n=18), warmed cradles (n=7) or KMC (n=7) before, during and subsequent to the study. CTM was deemed non-inferior since warmed babies had higher axillary temperature compared with SoC (mean increase 0.11±0.03°C SEM; p<0.001). Post hoc comparison to radiant warmers alone showed that CTM led to a higher axillary temperature (mean increase by 0.14±0.03°C SEM; p<0.001).
Short-term use of CTM compared with radiant warmers and other modes of warming is non-inferior to SoC and efficacious in maintaining body temperature. No adverse effects were reported. An extended multinational trial, preferably one that demonstrates longer-term thermoregulation, is warranted.
Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2010/091/002916 and CTRI/2011/04/001696).
由于体温调节功能改变,外部热支持对早产儿或患病婴儿至关重要。保温箱是长期热支持的金标准,已在许多国家成功采用。在资源有限的环境中,当婴儿无法进行袋鼠式护理(KMC)时,诸如辐射保暖器、毯子等替代方法常被用作标准护理(SoC)。
在这项试点研究中,我们评估了使用相变材料的传导热床垫(CTM)作为低成本保暖器的可行性。我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心开放标签随机对照试验,以确定该CTM在低出生体重婴儿中相对于SoC保暖措施的非劣效性。主要结局是维持腋温。
我们将160名婴儿随机分为CTM组或SoC组。后一组在研究前、研究期间和研究后继续通过辐射保暖器(n = 48)、毯子(n = 18)、加热摇篮(n = 7)或KMC(n = 7)接受保暖。CTM被认为是非劣效的,因为与SoC相比,使用CTM保暖的婴儿腋温更高(平均升高0.11±0.03°C,标准误;p < 0.001)。事后与单独使用辐射保暖器的比较表明,CTM导致腋温更高(平均升高0.14±0.03°C,标准误;p < 0.001)。
与辐射保暖器和其他保暖方式相比,CTM的短期使用不劣于SoC,且在维持体温方面有效。未报告不良反应。有必要进行一项扩展的多国试验,最好是一项能证明长期体温调节的试验。
印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2010/091/002916和CTRI/2011/04/001696)。