Wu Bin, Xu Ting, Li Youping, Yin Xi
Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37,Guoxue Lane, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 20(3):CD010893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010893.pub2.
Familial Mediterranean fever, a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine as a potential drug for preventing attacks of familial Mediterranean fever. For those people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as rilonacept, anakinra, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide and interferon-alpha might be beneficial.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with familial Mediterranean fever.
We used detailed search strategies to search the following databases: CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI); Wan Fang; and VIP. In addition, we also searched the clinical trials registries including ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, as well as references listed in relevant reports.Date of last search: 21 May 2014.
Randomized controlled studies of people with diagnosis of familial Mediterranean fever, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, etanercept, infliximab, thalidomide, interferon-alpha, ImmunoGuard™ (a herbal dietary supplement) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other.
The authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data to present the risk ratio or mean difference with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed overall evidence quality according to the GRADE approach.
We included four randomized placebo-controlled studies with a total of 75 participants (aged three to 53 years); three were of cross-over and one of parallel design. Two studies used the active intervention of oral colchicine (0.6 mg three times daily or 0.5 mg twice daily), one study used oral ImmunoGuard™ and the fourth used rilonacept as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to three months.The two most recent studies were generally well-designed, except for an unclear risk of detection bias in one of these. However, some inadequacy existed in the other two older studies, where each had an unclear risk of selection bias, a high risk of attrition bias, an unclear risk of reporting bias and a high risk of other potential bias (baseline characteristics such as mutation status and disease severity were not described); one of these studies additionally had an unclear risk of detection bias.We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, any adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack, but data were not available for all outcomes across all comparisons.Based on one study (15 participants), there was a significant reduction in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months when colchicine was administered at a dose of 0.6 mg three times daily (14% versus 100%), risk ratio 0.21 (95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.95); however, the GRADE evidence quality was low. Based on two further studies, there was no significant reduction in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months when colchicine was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg twice daily (22 participants) in people with familial Mediterranean fever, or at three months when rilonacept was used in individuals who were colchicine-resistant or colchicine-intolerant (14 participants). In the ImmunoGuard™ study (24 participants) acute phase response indicators (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein) were not reduced after one month treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited randomized controlled studies assessing interventions for people with familial Mediterranean fever. Based on the evidence, colchicine appears to reduce the number of people experiencing attacks; however, only a few low-quality randomized controlled studies contributed data for analysis. Further randomized controlled studies examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever can be drawn.
家族性地中海热是一种遗传性自身炎症性疾病,主要影响居住在地中海地区的族群。早期研究报道秋水仙碱是预防家族性地中海热发作的一种潜在药物。对于那些对秋水仙碱耐药或不耐受的人,诸如利洛纳塞、阿那白滞素、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、沙利度胺和α干扰素等药物可能有益。
评估减轻家族性地中海热患者炎症反应的干预措施的疗效和安全性。
我们使用详细的检索策略检索了以下数据库:Cochrane系统评价数据库;医学期刊数据库;荷兰医学文摘数据库;中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网数据库、万方数据库和维普数据库。此外,我们还检索了临床试验注册库,包括美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库、国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和中国临床试验注册中心,以及相关报告中列出的参考文献。最后一次检索日期:2014年5月21日。
诊断为家族性地中海热的患者的随机对照研究,比较活性干预措施(包括秋水仙碱、阿那白滞素、利洛纳塞、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、沙利度胺、α干扰素、免疫卫士™(一种草本膳食补充剂)和非甾体类抗炎药)与安慰剂或不治疗,或比较活性药物之间的差异。
作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们汇总数据以呈现风险比或均值差及其95%置信区间。我们根据GRADE方法评估总体证据质量。
我们纳入了四项随机安慰剂对照研究,共75名参与者(年龄3至53岁);三项为交叉设计,一项为平行设计。两项研究采用口服秋水仙碱(每日三次,每次0.6毫克或每日两次,每次0.5毫克)的活性干预措施,一项研究采用口服免疫卫士™,第四项研究采用皮下注射利洛纳塞。每个研究组的持续时间为1至3个月。最近的两项研究总体设计良好,但其中一项研究的检测偏倚风险不明。然而,另外两项较早的研究存在一些不足,每项研究的选择偏倚风险不明、失访偏倚风险高、报告偏倚风险不明以及其他潜在偏倚风险高(未描述突变状态和疾病严重程度等基线特征);其中一项研究的检测偏倚风险也不明。我们旨在报告发作的参与者人数、发作时间、任何药物不良反应以及发作急性期一些生化标志物的反应,但并非所有比较的所有结局都有数据。基于一项研究(15名参与者),当每日三次给予0.6毫克秋水仙碱时,三个月时发作的人数显著减少(14%对100%),风险比为0.21(95%置信区间0.05至0.95);然而,GRADE证据质量较低。基于另外两项研究,对于家族性地中海热患者,当每日两次给予0.5毫克秋水仙碱时,两个月时发作的参与者人数没有显著减少(22名参与者),或者对于秋水仙碱耐药或不耐受的个体,当使用利洛纳塞时,三个月时发作的参与者人数也没有显著减少(14名参与者)。在免疫卫士™研究(24名参与者)中,治疗一个月后急性期反应指标(包括红细胞沉降率、白细胞计数和C反应蛋白)没有降低。
评估家族性地中海热患者干预措施的随机对照研究有限。基于现有证据,秋水仙碱似乎能减少发作的人数;然而,仅有少数低质量的随机对照研究提供了分析数据。在能够就减轻家族性地中海热炎症反应的干预措施的疗效和安全性得出全面结论之前,有必要进行更多的随机对照研究,不仅要研究秋水仙碱,还要研究其他活性干预措施。