• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study.中年及老年人群的控制信念与死亡、中风和心肌梗死风险:一项观察性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1156-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
2
Capsule Commentary on Duan-Porter et al., Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study.对段-波特等人的《中年及老年人的控制信念与死亡、中风和心肌梗死风险:一项观察性研究》的胶囊评论
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3340-4.
3
Is gout a risk equivalent to diabetes for stroke and myocardial infarction? A retrospective claims database study.痛风是否是中风和心肌梗死的风险等同于糖尿病?一项回顾性理赔数据库研究。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Oct 17;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1427-5.
4
Diabetes, myocardial infarction and stroke are distinct and duration-dependent predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in older men.糖尿病、心肌梗死和中风是老年男性后续心血管事件和全因死亡率的不同且与持续时间相关的预测因素。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Mar;100(3):1038-47. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3339. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
5
Smoking as an independent risk factor for myocardial infarction or stroke in type 2 diabetes: a report from the Swedish National Diabetes Register.吸烟作为2型糖尿病患者发生心肌梗死或中风的独立危险因素:来自瑞典国家糖尿病登记处的报告。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Aug;16(4):506-12. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832ccc50.
6
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
7
Temporal trends in prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a population-based cohort of incident myocardial infarction and impact of diabetes on survival.基于人群的首次心肌梗死队列中糖尿病患病率的时间趋势以及糖尿病对生存的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Aug;81(8):1034-40. doi: 10.4065/81.8.1034.
8
Control beliefs and risk for 4-year mortality in older adults: a prospective cohort study.老年人的控制信念与4年死亡率风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0390-3.
9
Recurrent vascular events in lacunar stroke patients with metabolic syndrome and/or diabetes.伴有代谢综合征和/或糖尿病的腔隙性卒中患者的复发性血管事件
Neurology. 2015 Sep 15;85(11):935-41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001933.
10
Warfarin, kidney dysfunction, and outcomes following acute myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation.华法林、肾功能障碍与心房颤动患者急性心肌梗死后的结局。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 5;311(9):919-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1334.

引用本文的文献

1
At the Heart of Resilience: Empowering Women's Agency in Navigating Cardiovascular Disease.韧性的核心:增强女性应对心血管疾病的能力。
CJC Open. 2023 Dec 16;6(2Part B):473-484. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.013. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
The Life Skills of Older Americans: Association with Economic, Psychological, Social, and Health Outcomes.美国老年人的生活技能:与经济、心理、社会和健康结果的关联。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 5;8(1):9669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27909-w.
3
Control beliefs and risk for 4-year mortality in older adults: a prospective cohort study.老年人的控制信念与4年死亡率风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0390-3.
4
Older adults with poor self-rated memory have less depressive symptoms and better memory performance when perceived self-efficacy is high.当自我效能感较高时,自评记忆力较差的老年人抑郁症状较少,记忆表现也较好。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;31(7):783-90. doi: 10.1002/gps.4392. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Capsule Commentary on Duan-Porter et al., Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study.对段-波特等人的《中年及老年人的控制信念与死亡、中风和心肌梗死风险:一项观察性研究》的胶囊评论
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1189. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3340-4.

本文引用的文献

1
(2) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes.(2) 糖尿病的分类与诊断。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S8-S16. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S005.
2
(7) Approaches to glycemic treatment.(7)血糖治疗方法。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S41-8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S010.
3
Designing smarter pay-for-performance programs.设计更智能的绩效薪酬方案。
JAMA. 2014;312(24):2617-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15398.
4
Medical homes and cost and utilization among high-risk patients.高危患者中的医疗之家与成本及医疗服务利用率
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Mar 1;20(3):e61-71.
5
Agreement between self-reported and general practitioner-reported chronic conditions among multimorbid patients in primary care - results of the MultiCare Cohort Study.基层医疗中多病患者自我报告与全科医生报告的慢性病之间的一致性——多保健队列研究结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 1;15:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-39.
6
The patient-centered medical home: one size does not fit all.以患者为中心的医疗之家:并非一概而论。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):802-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.352.
7
The anatomy of health care in the United States.美国医疗保健的解剖结构。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 13;310(18):1947-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281425.
8
Positive psychological characteristics in diabetes: a review.糖尿病中的积极心理特征:综述。
Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Dec;13(6):917-29. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0430-8.
9
The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors.《1990-2010 年美国健康状况:疾病、伤害及危险因素负担》
JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):591-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
10
Level and change in perceived control predict 19-year mortality: findings from the Americans' changing lives study.感知控制的水平和变化预测 19 年死亡率:来自美国人生活变化研究的发现。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Oct;49(10):1833-47. doi: 10.1037/a0031041. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

中年及老年人群的控制信念与死亡、中风和心肌梗死风险:一项观察性研究

Control Beliefs and Risk for Death, Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Middle-aged and Older Adults: An Observational Study.

作者信息

Duan-Porter Wei, Hastings Susan Nicole, Neelon Brian, Van Houtven Courtney Harold

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA,

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1156-63. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3275-9
PMID:25792069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4510216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic health conditions account for the largest proportion of illness-related mortality and morbidity as well as most of healthcare spending in the USA. Control beliefs may be important for outcomes in individuals with chronic illness.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether control beliefs are associated with the risk for death, incident stroke and incident myocardial infarction (MI), particularly for individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or hypertension.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 5,662 respondents to the Health and Retirement Study with baseline health, demographic and psychological data in 2006, with no history of previous stroke or MI.

MAIN MEASURES

Perceived global control, measured as two dimensions--"constraints" and "mastery"--and health-specific control were self-reported. Event-free survival was measured in years, where "event" was the composite of death, incident stroke and MI. Year of stroke or MI was self-reported; year of death was obtained from respondents' family.

KEY RESULTS

Mean baseline age was 66.2 years; 994 (16.7%) had DM and 3,023 (53.4%) hypertension. Overall, 173 (3.1%) suffered incident strokes, 129 (2.3%) had incident MI, and 465 (8.2%) died. There were no significant interactions between control beliefs and baseline DM or hypertension in predicting event-free survival. Elevated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with DM (1.33, 95 % CI 1.07-1.67), hypertension (1.31, 95% CI 1.07-1.61) and perceived constraints in the third (1.55, 95% CI 1.12-2.15) and fourth quartiles (1.61, 95% CI 1.14-2.26). Health-specific control scores in the third (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59-1.03) and fourth quartiles (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92) were protective, but only the latter category had a statistically significant decreased risk. Combined high perceived constraints and low health-specific control had the highest risk (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.41-2.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Control beliefs were not associated with differential risk for those with DM and/or hypertension, but they predicted significant differences in event-free survival for the general cohort.

摘要

背景

在美国,慢性健康状况在与疾病相关的死亡率和发病率中占比最大,且占据了大部分医疗支出。控制信念可能对慢性病患者的预后很重要。

目的

确定控制信念是否与死亡风险、中风发病率和心肌梗死(MI)发病率相关,尤其是对于患有糖尿病(DM)和/或高血压的个体。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

参与者

共有5662名参与健康与退休研究的受访者,他们在2006年提供了基线健康、人口统计学和心理数据,且无既往中风或MI病史。

主要测量指标

感知到的总体控制通过“限制”和“掌控”两个维度进行衡量,特定健康控制通过自我报告获得。无事件生存期以年为单位进行测量,其中“事件”是死亡、中风发病率和MI的综合情况。中风或MI的年份通过自我报告;死亡年份从受访者家属处获得。

关键结果

平均基线年龄为66.2岁;994人(16.7%)患有DM,3023人(53.4%)患有高血压。总体而言,173人(3.1%)发生中风,129人(2.3%)发生MI,465人(8.2%)死亡。在预测无事件生存期时,控制信念与基线DM或高血压之间没有显著的相互作用。调整后的风险比(HR)升高与DM(1.33,95%CI 1.07 - 1.67)、高血压(1.31,95%CI 1.07 - 1.61)以及第三(1.55,95%CI 1.12 - 2.15)和第四四分位数(1.61,95%CI 1.14 - 2.26)中的感知限制相关。第三(HR 0.78,95%CI 0.59 - 1.03)和第四四分位数(HR 0.70,95%CI 0.53 - 0.92)中的特定健康控制得分具有保护作用,但只有后一组别的风险有统计学意义的降低。高感知限制和低特定健康控制相结合的风险最高(HR 1.93,95%CI 1.41 - 2.64)。

结论

控制信念与DM和/或高血压患者的差异风险无关,但它们预测了总体队列无事件生存期的显著差异。