文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology.

作者信息

Agorastos Theodoros, Chatzistamatiou Kimon, Katsamagkas Taxiarchis, Koliopoulos George, Daponte Alexandros, Constantinidis Theocharis, Constantinidis Theodoros C

机构信息

4th Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokratio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Athens, Attikon Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0119755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119755. eCollection 2015.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119755
PMID:25793281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4368762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to assess the performance of a high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA test with individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping as a method for primary cervical cancer screening compared with liquid-based cytology (LBC) in a population of Greek women taking part in routine cervical cancer screening. METHODS: The study, conducted by the "HEllenic Real life Multicentric cErvical Screening" (HERMES) study group, involved the recruitment of 4,009 women, aged 25-55, who took part in routine cervical screening at nine Gynecology Departments in Greece. At first visit cervical specimens were collected for LBC and HPV testing using the Roche Cobas 4800 system. Women found positive for either cytology or HPV were referred for colposcopy, whereas women negative for both tests will be retested after three years. The study is ongoing and the results of the first screening round are reported herein. RESULTS: Valid results for cytology and HPV testing were obtained for 3,993 women. The overall prevalence of HR-HPV was 12.7%, of HPV-16 2.7% and of HPV-18 1.4%. Of those referred for colposcopy, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) was detected in 41 women (1.07%). At the threshold of CIN2+, cytology [atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or worse] and HPV testing showed a sensitivity of 53.7% and 100% respectively, without change between age groups. Cytology and HPV testing showed specificity of 96.8% and 90.3% respectively, which was increased in older women (≥30) in comparison to younger ones (25-29). Genotyping for HPV16/18 had similar accuracy to cytology for the detection of CIN2+ (sensitivity: 58.5%; specificity 97.5%) as well as for triage to colposcopy (sensitivity: 58.5% vs 53.7% for cytology). CONCLUSION: HPV testing has much better sensitivity than cytology to identify high-grade cervical lesions with slightly lower specificity. HPV testing with individual HPV-16/HPV-18 genotyping could represent a more accurate methodology for primary cervical cancer screening in comparison to liquid-based cytology, especially in older women.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f39/4368762/4feff3c86ba4/pone.0119755.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f39/4368762/8ae9ba6d64b4/pone.0119755.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f39/4368762/4feff3c86ba4/pone.0119755.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f39/4368762/8ae9ba6d64b4/pone.0119755.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f39/4368762/4feff3c86ba4/pone.0119755.g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Primary screening for cervical cancer based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and HPV 16 and HPV 18 genotyping, in comparison to cytology.

PLoS One. 2015-3-20

[2]
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.

Lancet Oncol. 2011-8-22

[3]
Comparison of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Genotyping and Cytological Testing as Triage Testing Within Human Papillomavirus-Based Screening in Mexico.

JAMA Netw Open. 2019-11-1

[4]
Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.

PLoS Med. 2017-9-19

[5]
Detection Rate of High-Grade Cervical Neoplasia and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotyping with Reflex Liquid-based Cytology in Cervical Cancer Screening.

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017-7

[6]
Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.

Gynecol Oncol. 2016-7

[7]
Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study.

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017-5

[8]
Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.

Cancer Sci. 2018-5-31

[9]
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.

Health Technol Assess. 2014-4

[10]
Methylation estimates the risk of precancer in HPV-infected women with discrepant results between cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.

Clin Epigenetics. 2019-10-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Risk-Based Triage Strategy by Extended HPV Genotyping for Women With LSIL Cytology: A Real-World Study.

J Med Virol. 2025-5

[2]
Epidemiological, economic and humanistic burden of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024-12-12

[3]
A new approach for detecting HPV DNA in cervical swabs: comparison of nucleic acid extraction with direct PCR.

Virol J. 2025-1-11

[4]
Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia.

Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024-9

[5]
Evaluation of silica spin‑column and magnetic bead formats for rapid DNA methylation analysis in clinical and point‑of‑care settings.

Biomed Rep. 2024-6-10

[6]
The importance of combined HPV and CINtec® PLUS genotyping testing for p16 in women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma.

Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024

[7]
Clinical impact of age‑specific distribution of combination patterns of cytology and high‑risk HPV status on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more.

Oncol Lett. 2023-7-20

[8]
HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature.

Cancers (Basel). 2023-3-8

[9]
The Hybrid Capture 2 Results in Correlation with the Pap Test, Sexual Behavior, and Characteristics of Romanian Women.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-2-21

[10]
Cellular Landscaping of COVID-19 and Gynaecological Cancers: An Infrequent Correlation.

J Oncol. 2022-10-17

本文引用的文献

[1]
A study of genotyping for management of human papillomavirus-positive, cytology-negative cervical screening results.

J Clin Microbiol. 2015-1

[2]
Reassurance against future risk of precancer and cancer conferred by a negative human papillomavirus test.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014-7-18

[3]
Epidemiology of HPV infection and current status of cervical cancer prevention in Greece: final results of the LYSISTRATA cross-sectional study.

Eur J Cancer Prev. 2014-9

[4]
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.

Health Technol Assess. 2014-4

[5]
Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial.

BMJ. 2014-1-16

[6]
Smoking as a major risk factor for cervical cancer and pre-cancer: results from the EPIC cohort.

Int J Cancer. 2014-1-6

[7]
Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials.

Lancet. 2013-11-3

[8]
Comparing the performance of six human papillomavirus tests in a screening population.

Br J Cancer. 2013-1-31

[9]
Primary human papillomavirus testing in organized cervical screening.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013-2

[10]
Evidence regarding human papillomavirus testing in secondary prevention of cervical cancer.

Vaccine. 2012-11-20

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索