Fontana Andrea, Spadaro Sara, Copetti Massimiliano, Spoto Belinda, Salvemini Lucia, Pizzini Patrizia, Frittitta Lucia, Mallamaci Francesca, Pellegrini Fabio, Trischitta Vincenzo, Menzaghi Claudia
Unit of Biostatistics, IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Scuola Superiore di Catania, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120419. eCollection 2015.
Studies concerning the association between circulating resistin and mortality risk have reported, so far, conflicting results.
To investigate the association between resistin and both all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality risk by 1) analyzing data from the Gargano Heart Study (GHS) prospective design (n=359 patients; 81 and 58 all-cause and CV deaths, respectively); 2) performing meta-analyses of all published studies addressing the above mentioned associations.
MEDLINE and Web of Science search of studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) of circulating resistin for all-cause or CV mortality.
Performed independently by two investigators, using a standardized data extraction sheet.
In GHS, adjusted HRs per one standard deviation (SD) increment in resistin concentration were 1.28 (95% CI: 1.07-1.54) and 1.32 (95% CI: 1.06-1.64) for all-cause and CV mortality, respectively. The meta-analyses included 7 studies (n=4016; 961 events) for all-cause mortality and 6 studies (n=4,187: 412 events) for CV mortality. Pooled HRs per one SD increment in resistin levels were 1.21 (95% CI: 1.03-1.42, Q-test p for heterogeneity<0.001) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01-1.10, Q-test p for heterogeneity=0.199) for all-cause and CV mortality, respectively. At meta-regression analyses, study mean age explained 9.9% of all-cause mortality studies heterogeneity. After adjusting for age, HR for all-cause mortality was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.06-1.45).
Our results provide evidence for an association between circulating resistin and mortality risk among high-risk patients as are those with diabetes and coronary artery disease.
迄今为止,有关循环抵抗素与死亡风险之间关联的研究报告结果相互矛盾。
通过以下方式研究抵抗素与全因死亡率和心血管(CV)死亡率风险之间的关联:1)分析加尔加诺心脏研究(GHS)前瞻性设计的数据(n = 359例患者;全因死亡81例,CV死亡58例);2)对所有发表的涉及上述关联的研究进行荟萃分析。
通过MEDLINE和科学网检索报告循环抵抗素与全因或CV死亡率的风险比(HR)的研究。
由两名研究人员使用标准化数据提取表独立进行。
在GHS中,抵抗素浓度每增加一个标准差(SD),全因死亡率和CV死亡率的调整后HR分别为1.28(95%CI:1.07 - 1.54)和1.32(95%CI:1.06 - 1.64)。荟萃分析纳入了7项全因死亡率研究(n = 4016;961例事件)和6项CV死亡率研究(n = 4187;412例事件)。抵抗素水平每增加一个SD,全因死亡率和CV死亡率的合并HR分别为1.21(95%CI:1.03 - 1.42,异质性Q检验p<0.001)和1.05(95%CI:1.01 - 1.10,异质性Q检验p = 0.199)。在荟萃回归分析中,研究平均年龄解释了全因死亡率研究异质性的9.9%。调整年龄后,全因死亡率的HR为1.24(95%CI:1.06 - 1.45)。
我们的结果为循环抵抗素与糖尿病和冠状动脉疾病等高危患者的死亡风险之间的关联提供了证据。