Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗单药一线治疗与希腊类风湿关节炎标准治疗的成本效用分析。

Cost-utility analysis of tocilizumab monotherapy in first line versus standard of care for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Greece.

作者信息

Athanasakis Kostas, Tarantilis Filippos, Tsalapati Konstantina, Konstantopoulou Thomais, Vritzali Eleni, Kyriopoulos John

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Avenue, 11521, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2015 Sep;35(9):1489-95. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3253-x. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding tocilizumab (TCZ) first line to a treatment sequence for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who had an inadequate response to one or more traditional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and are intolerant to methotrexate (MTX), or in whom continued treatment with MTX is considered inappropriate. An individual simulation model was applied to project lifetime costs and outcomes for 10,000 patients from a payer's perspective. The analysis compared the standard treatment pathway (STP) with a similar pathway, where treatment was initiated with TCZ. QALYs were used as primary efficacy outcomes. Efficacy data were obtained from the ADACTA trial and a network meta-analysis. Clinical practice standards were derived from an expert panel of Greek rheumatologists. Results indicate that a treatment sequence starting with TCZ yields 1.17 more QALYs (9.38 vs. 8.21) at an additional cost of €3,744 (€119,840 vs. €86,096) compared with the STP. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €28,837/QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirms robustness of these findings as consistently below a threshold of €45,000. The results of the analysis suggest that TCZ, when used as a first-line biologic monotherapy, can be a cost-effective treatment option for the management of active RA in patients in need of biologic monotherapy.

摘要

本研究旨在评估对于对一种或多种传统合成抗风湿药物(DMARDs)反应不足且对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)不耐受,或认为继续使用MTX治疗不合适的活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者,在治疗方案中一线添加托珠单抗(TCZ)的成本效益。从支付方的角度应用个体模拟模型来预测10,000名患者的终身成本和结局。该分析将标准治疗途径(STP)与以TCZ开始治疗的类似途径进行了比较。质量调整生命年(QALYs)被用作主要疗效结局。疗效数据来自ADACTA试验和一项网络荟萃分析。临床实践标准源自希腊风湿病专家小组。结果表明,与STP相比,以TCZ开始的治疗方案可多产生1.17个QALYs(分别为9.38和8.21),额外成本为3744欧元(分别为119,840欧元和86,096欧元)。增量成本效益比为每获得一个QALY 28,837欧元。概率敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性,始终低于45,000欧元的阈值。分析结果表明,当TCZ用作一线生物单药治疗时,对于需要生物单药治疗的活动性RA患者的管理而言,它可能是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验