Bolognesi Claudia, Roggieri Paola, Ropolo Monica, Thomas Philip, Hor Maryam, Fenech Michael, Nersesyan Armen, Knasmueller Siegfried
Environmental Carcinogenesis Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy, Commonwealth and Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Genome Health and Personalised Nutrition Laboratory, Food and Nutrition Flagship, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Environmental Carcinogenesis Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST Istituto Nazionale Ricerca sul Cancro, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, Genova 16132, Italy, Commonwealth and Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Genome Health and Personalised Nutrition Laboratory, Food and Nutrition Flagship, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia, Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Mutagenesis. 2015 Jul;30(4):545-55. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gev017. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
The buccal micronucleus cytome (BMCyt) assay is a minimally invasive approach for measuring DNA damage, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and cell death in exfoliated buccal cells. The main limitation for its use is the lack of knowledge about inter- and intra-laboratory variability in scoring micronuclei and other end points included in the cytome approach. In order to identify the main sources of variability across the BMCyt biomarkers, a scoring exercise was carried out between three experienced laboratories using the same set of slides and an identical set of detailed scoring criteria and associated images for the different end points. Single batches of slides were prepared from pooled samples of four groups of subjects characterised by different frequencies of cell types and micronuclei, namely Down syndrome patients, head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and two age- and gender-matched control groups. A good agreement among the laboratories in the identification of normal differentiated cells and of micronuclei was obtained. A 3-fold and 20-fold increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells and micronuclei in differentiated cells of Down syndrome patients and in cancer patients, respectively, compared to matched controls, was a consistent result in the three laboratories. The scores of other cell types and nuclear anomalies, such as basal, binucleated, condensed chromatin and karyorrhectic cells showed significant disagreement between and within laboratories indicating that their evaluation using the current visual scoring protocol does not yield robust results for these parameters. The guidelines for BMCyt assay application could be improved by combining the anomalies associated with cell death (condensed chromatin and karyorrhectic cells) in a single category and by defining more stringent criteria in classifying basal cell, binucleated cells and buds.
颊黏膜微核细胞组(BMCyt)检测是一种微创方法,用于测量脱落颊黏膜细胞中的DNA损伤、细胞增殖、细胞分化和细胞死亡。其应用的主要限制在于,对于微核及细胞组方法中包含的其他终点指标在实验室间和实验室内部的变异性缺乏了解。为了确定BMCyt生物标志物变异性的主要来源,三个经验丰富的实验室使用同一组载玻片以及针对不同终点指标的一套相同的详细评分标准和相关图像进行了评分练习。从四组受试者的混合样本中制备了单批次载玻片,这四组受试者的细胞类型和微核频率各不相同,分别为唐氏综合征患者、接受放疗的头颈癌患者以及两个年龄和性别匹配的对照组。各实验室在正常分化细胞和微核的识别方面达成了良好的一致性。与匹配对照组相比,唐氏综合征患者和癌症患者分化细胞中的微核化细胞和微核频率分别增加了3倍和20倍,这在三个实验室中都是一致的结果。其他细胞类型和核异常情况(如基底细胞、双核细胞、浓缩染色质细胞和核溶解细胞)的评分在实验室间和实验室内部均存在显著差异,这表明使用当前的视觉评分方案对这些参数进行评估并不能得出可靠的结果。通过将与细胞死亡相关的异常情况(浓缩染色质细胞和核溶解细胞)合并为一个类别,并在基底细胞、双核细胞和芽的分类中定义更严格的标准,可以改进BMCyt检测应用指南。