Canale Natale, Vieno Alessio, Griffiths Mark D, Rubaltelli Enrico, Santinello Massimo
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.
Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Italy.
Addict Behav. 2015 Jul;46:39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
Although the personality trait of urgency has been linked to problem gambling, less is known about psychological mechanisms that mediate the relationship between urgency and problem gambling. One individual variable of potential relevance to impulsivity and addictive disorders is age. The aims of this study were to examine: (i) a theoretical model associating urgency and gambling problems, (ii) the mediating effects of decision-making processes (operationalized as preference for small/immediate rewards and lower levels of deliberative decision-making); and (iii) age differences in these relationships. Participants comprised 986 students (64% male; mean age=19.51 years; SD=2.30) divided into three groups: 16-17 years, 18-21 years, and 22-25 years. All participants completed measures of urgency, problem gambling, and a delay-discounting questionnaire involving choices between a smaller amount of money received immediately and a larger amount of money received later. Participants were also asked to reflect on their decision-making process. Compared to those aged 16-17 years and 22-25 years, participants aged 18-21 years had a higher level of gambling problems and decreased scores on lower levels of deliberative decision-making. Higher levels of urgency were associated with higher levels of gambling problems. The association was mediated by a lower level of deliberative decision-making and preference for an immediate/small reward. A distinct pathway was observed for lower levels of deliberative decision-making. Young people who tend to act rashly in response to extreme moods, had lower levels of deliberative decision-making, that in turn were positively related to gambling problems. This study highlights unique decision-making pathways through which urgency trait may operate, suggesting that those developing prevention and/or treatment strategies may want to consider the model's variables, including urgency, delay discounting, and deliberative decision-making.
尽管冲动性人格特质与问题赌博有关,但对于介导冲动性与问题赌博之间关系的心理机制,我们了解得还较少。一个与冲动性和成瘾性障碍潜在相关的个体变量是年龄。本研究的目的是检验:(i)一个将冲动性与赌博问题联系起来的理论模型;(ii)决策过程的中介作用(具体表现为对小/即时奖励的偏好以及较低水平的审慎决策);以及(iii)这些关系中的年龄差异。研究参与者包括986名学生(64%为男性;平均年龄 = 19.51岁;标准差 = 2.30),分为三组:16 - 17岁、18 - 21岁和22 - 25岁。所有参与者都完成了冲动性、问题赌博的测量,以及一份涉及在立即获得少量金钱和稍后获得大量金钱之间进行选择的延迟折扣问卷。参与者还被要求反思他们的决策过程。与16 - 17岁和22 - 25岁的参与者相比,18 - 21岁的参与者有更高水平的赌博问题,并且在较低水平的审慎决策方面得分较低。较高水平的冲动性与较高水平的赌博问题相关。这种关联是由较低水平的审慎决策和对即时/小奖励的偏好介导的。观察到了一条关于较低水平审慎决策的独特路径。那些倾向于因极端情绪而鲁莽行事的年轻人,其审慎决策水平较低,而这又与赌博问题呈正相关。本研究突出了冲动性特质可能发挥作用的独特决策路径,表明那些制定预防和/或治疗策略的人可能需要考虑该模型的变量,包括冲动性、延迟折扣和审慎决策。