Barzilay Eran, Mazaki-Tovi Shali, Amikam Uri, de Castro Hila, Haas Jigal, Mazkereth Ram, Sivan Eyal, Schiff Eyal, Yinon Yoav
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):219.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether planned vaginal delivery is associated with increased risk of perinatal death and morbidity in twin pregnancies that are complicated by a very low birthweight of the second twin.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies in which the second twin's birthweight was ≤1500 g. One hundred ninety-three twin gestations met the study criteria; patients were classified into 2 groups according to the planned mode of delivery: (1) cesarean delivery (n = 142) and (2) vaginal delivery (n = 51). In the vaginal delivery group, 21 pairs were in cephalic-cephalic presentation at the time of delivery; 28 pairs were cephalic-noncephalic, and 2 pairs were noncephalic-noncephalic. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as the presence of neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3-4.
Trial of vaginal delivery was successful for both twins in 90.5% of cephalic-cephalic twins and 96.4% in cephalic-noncephalic twins. The rate of intraventricular hemorrhage was significantly higher in the vaginal delivery group (29.4% vs 8.5%, respectively; P = .013; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-10.1). The increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in the vaginal delivery groups was evident in both twin A (17.6% vs 7.0%; P = .029) and twin B (15.7% vs 4.9%; P = .014); however, these differences were not significant after adjustment for possible confounders (twin A: adjusted OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.58-5.55; twin B: adjusted OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.63-7.25). In addition, subgroup analysis revealed that both cephalic-cephalic and cephalic-noncephalic twins who were delivered vaginally had increased risk for intraventricular hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between the cesarean and vaginal delivery groups in the rates of Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, arterial cord pH <7.1, composite adverse neonatal outcome, and neonatal mortality rate. However, the rate of respiratory distress syndrome was significantly lower in the vaginal delivery group (66.7% vs 69%; P = .042; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.96).
Vaginal delivery of very low birthweight twins is associated with an increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage, regardless of presentation. Because of the small sample size and the retrospective cohort design, large prospective randomized studies are needed.
本研究旨在确定对于双胎妊娠中第二胎儿出生体重极低的情况,计划经阴道分娩是否会增加围产期死亡和发病风险。
我们对第二胎儿出生体重≤1500g的双胎妊娠进行了一项回顾性队列研究。193例双胎妊娠符合研究标准;根据计划分娩方式将患者分为两组:(1)剖宫产(n = 142)和(2)阴道分娩(n = 51)。在阴道分娩组中,分娩时21对为头对头胎位;28对为头对非头胎位,2对为非头对非头胎位。复合不良新生儿结局定义为存在新生儿死亡、呼吸窘迫综合征、败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎或3 - 4级脑室内出血。
在头对头双胎中,90.5%的双胎经阴道分娩成功,头对非头双胎中这一比例为96.4%。阴道分娩组脑室内出血发生率显著更高(分别为29.4%和8.5%;P = 0.013;调整优势比[OR],3.65;95%置信区间[CI],1.32 - 10.1)。阴道分娩组脑室内出血风险增加在A胎儿(17.6%对7.0%;P = 0.029)和B胎儿(15.7%对4.9%;P = 0.014)中均明显;然而,在对可能的混杂因素进行调整后,这些差异无统计学意义(A胎儿:调整OR,1.79;95% CI,0.58 - 5.55;B胎儿:调整OR,2.13;95% CI,0.63 - 7.25)。此外,亚组分析显示,经阴道分娩的头对头和头对非头双胎脑室内出血风险均增加。剖宫产组和阴道分娩组在5分钟时Apgar评分<7、脐动脉血pH<7.1、复合不良新生儿结局及新生儿死亡率方面无显著差异。然而,阴道分娩组呼吸窘迫综合征发生率显著更低(66.7%对69%;P = 0.042;OR,0.34;95% CI,0.12 - 0.96)。
极低出生体重双胎经阴道分娩与脑室内出血风险增加相关,与胎位无关。由于样本量小及回顾性队列设计,需要进行大型前瞻性随机研究。