Prus Robert
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Am Sociol. 2015;46(1):122-167. doi: 10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9.
Although his work has been largely overlooked by symbolic interactionists and other students of deviance, Aristotle (c384-322BCE) addresses community life, activity, agency, and persuasive interchange in ways that not only are remarkably consistent with contemporary symbolic interactionist approaches to deviance, but that also conceptually inform present day theories of deviance and provide valuable transhistorical comparison points for subsequent analysis. Following (1) a brief overview of an interactionist approach to the study of deviance, attention is given to (2) classical Greek conceptions of good and evil (especially as these are articulated by Plato) before turning more directly to (3) Aristotle's notions of wrongdoing as this is reflected in his considerations of community, morality, agency, and culpability. While informed by Aristotle's considerations of causality (as addressed in and ), this statement builds most centrally on Aristotle's and . Striving for a broader understanding of deviance as a humanly engaged feature of community life, the paper briefly compares Aristotle's "theory of deviance" with Prus and Grills (2003) interactionist analysis of deviance. The paper (4) concludes with an assessment of the relative contributions of contemporary interactionist scholarship and Aristotle's materials for the study of deviance as a community-engaged process.
尽管亚里士多德(公元前384年 - 公元前322年)的著作在很大程度上被符号互动主义者及其他研究越轨行为的学者所忽视,但他对社区生活、活动、能动性和说服性交流的论述,不仅与当代符号互动主义者研究越轨行为的方法高度一致,而且在概念上为当今的越轨行为理论提供了信息,并为后续分析提供了宝贵的跨历史比较点。在(1)简要概述一种研究越轨行为的互动主义方法之后,先关注(2)古希腊关于善与恶的观念(尤其是柏拉图所阐述的那些观念),然后更直接地转向(3)亚里士多德对不法行为的看法,这体现在他对社区、道德、能动性和罪责的思考中。虽然本论述受到亚里士多德对因果关系的思考(如在[具体文献1]和[具体文献2]中所论述的)的影响,但最主要是基于亚里士多德的[具体文献3]和[具体文献4]。为了更广泛地理解越轨行为作为社区生活中人类参与的一个特征,本文简要比较了亚里士多德的“越轨行为理论”与普鲁斯和格里尔斯(2003年)对越轨行为的互动主义分析。本文(4)最后评估了当代互动主义学术研究和亚里士多德的资料对于将越轨行为作为一个社区参与过程进行研究的相对贡献。