Ahn Jooeun, Hogan Neville
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Colombia, Canada.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119596. eCollection 2015.
Mathematical techniques have provided tools to quantify the stability of rhythmic movements of humans and machines as well as mathematical models. One archetypal example is the use of Floquet multipliers: assuming periodic motion to be a limit-cycle of a nonlinear oscillator, local stability has been assessed by evaluating the rate of convergence to the limit-cycle. However, the accuracy of the assessment in experiments is questionable: Floquet multipliers provide a measure of orbital stability for deterministic systems, but various components of biological systems and machines involve inevitable noise. In this study, we show that the conventional estimate of orbital stability, which depends on regression, has bias in the presence of noise. We quantify the bias, and devise a new method to estimate orbital stability more accurately. Compared with previous methods, our method substantially reduces the bias, providing acceptable estimates of orbital stability with an order-of-magnitude fewer cycles.
数学技术为量化人类和机器的节律性运动稳定性以及数学模型提供了工具。一个典型的例子是使用弗洛凯乘数:假设周期性运动是非线性振荡器的极限环,通过评估收敛到极限环的速率来评估局部稳定性。然而,实验中评估的准确性值得怀疑:弗洛凯乘数为确定性系统提供了轨道稳定性的度量,但生物系统和机器的各种组件都存在不可避免的噪声。在本研究中,我们表明,依赖于回归的传统轨道稳定性估计在存在噪声的情况下存在偏差。我们对偏差进行了量化,并设计了一种新方法来更准确地估计轨道稳定性。与以前的方法相比,我们的方法大大减少了偏差,用数量级更少的周期提供了可接受的轨道稳定性估计。