Lauver Jakob D, Cayot Trent E, Scheuermann Barry W
a Department of Kinesiology, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Research Laboratory , University of Toledo , Toledo , OH , USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(3):309-16. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1022605. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
This study compared the muscular activation of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid and triceps brachii during a free-weight barbell bench press performed at 0°, 30°, 45° and -15° bench angles. Fourteen healthy resistance trained males (age 21.4 ± 0.4 years) participated in this study. One set of six repetitions for each bench press conditions at 65% one repetition maximum were performed. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was utilised to examine the muscular activation of the selected muscles during the eccentric and concentric phases. In addition, each phase was subdivided into 25% contraction durations, resulting in four separate time points for comparison between bench conditions. The sEMG of upper pectoralis displayed no difference during any of the bench conditions when examining the complete concentric contraction, however differences during 26-50% contraction duration were found for both the 30° [122.5 ± 10.1% maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)] and 45° (124 ± 9.1% MVIC) bench condition, resulting in greater sEMG compared to horizontal (98.2 ± 5.4% MVIC) and -15 (96.1 ± 5.5% MVIC). The sEMG of lower pectoralis was greater during -15° (100.4 ± 5.7% MVIC), 30° (86.6 ± 4.8% MVIC) and horizontal (100.1 ± 5.2% MVIC) bench conditions compared to the 45° (71.9 ± 4.5% MVIC) for the whole concentric contraction. The results of this study support the use of a horizontal bench to achieve muscular activation of both the upper and lower heads of the pectoralis. However, a bench incline angle of 30° or 45° resulted in greater muscular activation during certain time points, suggesting that it is important to consider how muscular activation is affected at various time points when selecting bench press exercises.
本研究比较了在0°、30°、45°和-15°的卧推角度下进行自由重量杠铃卧推时胸大肌、三角肌前束和肱三头肌的肌肉激活情况。14名健康的有阻力训练经验的男性(年龄21.4±0.4岁)参与了本研究。在65%的一次重复最大值下,对每个卧推条件进行一组6次重复。使用表面肌电图(sEMG)来检查所选肌肉在离心和向心阶段的肌肉激活情况。此外,每个阶段被细分为25%的收缩持续时间,从而产生四个独立的时间点用于比较不同卧推条件。在上胸肌的sEMG方面,在检查整个向心收缩时,任何卧推条件下均未发现差异,然而,在30°(122.5±10.1%最大自主等长收缩(MVIC))和45°(124±9.1%MVIC)卧推条件下,在26 - 50%收缩持续时间内发现了差异,导致与水平(98.2±5.4%MVIC)和-15°(96.1±5.5%MVIC)相比,sEMG更大。在整个向心收缩过程中,与45°(71.9±4.5%MVIC)相比,下胸肌的sEMG在-15°(100.4±5.7%MVIC)、30°(86.6±4.8%MVIC)和水平(100.1±5.2%MVIC)卧推条件下更大。本研究结果支持使用水平卧推来实现胸大肌上下头的肌肉激活。然而,30°或45°的卧推倾斜角度在某些时间点会导致更大的肌肉激活,这表明在选择卧推练习时,考虑不同时间点肌肉激活如何受到影响是很重要的。