Suppr超能文献

杠铃卧推和哑铃飞鸟在抗阻训练男性中的肌肉激活比较。

A Comparison of Muscle Activation between Barbell Bench Press and Dumbbell Flyes in Resistance-Trained Males.

机构信息

Western Norway University, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Department of Sport, Food and Natural Science, Campus Sogndal, Norway.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Nov 19;19(4):645-651. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the muscle activity in the prime movers and antagonist between the barbell bench press (BBP) and the dumbbell flyes (DF) Seventeen resistance-trained men (age 22.9 ± 1.8 yrs; height 1.80 ± 0.06 m; body mass 80.0 ± 8.3 kg), with 4.8 ± 2.0 years resistance training experience, completed the study. The surface electromyographic activation was measured in four different muscles (pectoralis major, anterior deltoids, triceps brachii, and biceps brachii) during six repetition maximum loads in both exercises. To better understand eventual differences, an in-depth analysis of the fifth repetition was performed, dividing it into six phases (lower, middle, and upper phase of the descending and ascending movement). The results showed a higher muscle activation in the whole movement and the majority of the lifting phases for pectoralis major, deltoids anterior, and triceps brachii for the BBP compared to the DF (8-81 %, p ≤ 0.05). However, the antagonist biceps brachii showed a higher muscle activation (57-86 %, p ≤ 0.05) in the DF compared to the BBP. In conclusion, both exercises could be included in training programs, but the BBP should be emphasized because of the higher muscle activation overall. Among specific populations, were tasks based on strength and control in a horizontal shoulder flexion position with extended elbows often occurs, the DF might prove useful.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较杠铃卧推(BBP)和哑铃飞鸟(DF)两种运动中主动肌和拮抗肌的肌肉活动。17 名有抗阻训练经验的男性(年龄 22.9 ± 1.8 岁;身高 1.80 ± 0.06 m;体重 80.0 ± 8.3 kg)参与了这项研究,他们的抗阻训练经验为 4.8 ± 2.0 年。在这两种运动中,使用表面肌电图测量了四个不同肌肉(胸大肌、前三角肌、肱三头肌和肱二头肌)在最大重复 6 次时的激活情况。为了更好地理解潜在的差异,对第五次重复进行了深入分析,将其分为下降和上升运动的下、中、上三个阶段。结果表明,与 DF 相比,BBP 在整个运动过程中和大部分提升阶段中,胸大肌、前三角肌和肱三头肌的肌肉激活程度更高(8-81%,p ≤ 0.05)。然而,拮抗肌肱二头肌在 DF 中的肌肉激活程度更高(57-86%,p ≤ 0.05)。综上所述,这两种运动都可以包含在训练计划中,但由于整体肌肉激活程度更高,BBP 应该得到更多的重视。在特定人群中,如果经常进行基于力量和控制的水平肩部前屈运动,且肘部伸展,则 DF 可能会更有用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review.
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Feb 24;19(1):195-203. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Comparison of Kinematics and Muscle Activation between Push-up and Bench Press.俯卧撑与卧推的运动学和肌肉激活比较
Sports Med Int Open. 2019 Sep 5;3(3):E74-E81. doi: 10.1055/a-1001-2526. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验