Sakakibara Brodie M, Miller William C
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rehabilitation Research Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Center, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jul;96(7):1360-3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
To estimate the prevalence of low wheelchair-mobility and self-management self-efficacy and to evaluate the association with wheelchair skills.
Cross-sectional.
Community.
Community-dwelling manual wheelchair users (N=123) who were ≥50 years of age (mean, 59.7±7.5y) and from British Columbia and Quebec, Canada.
None.
The 13-item mobility and 8-item self-management subscales from the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale-Short Form (standardized scores range, 0-100) measured self-efficacy, and the 32-item Wheelchair Skills Test, Questionnaire Version (scores range, 0-100) measured wheelchair skills. A score of 50 was used to differentiate individuals with high and low self-efficacy, and a score of 72 differentiated between high and low wheelchair skills.
The prevalence of low wheelchair-mobility and self-management self-efficacy was 28.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.6-36.4) and 11.4% (95% CI, 5.8-17.0), respectively, and their bivariate association with wheelchair skills was r=.70 and r=.39, respectively. Of the sample, 16% reported conflicting mobility self-efficacy and skill scores; 25% reported low self-efficacy and high skills. Of the participants, 30% reported conflicting scores between self-management self-efficacy and wheelchair skills, with 8.1% reporting lower self-efficacy than skill.
Low self-efficacy was relatively high in this sample as was its discordance with wheelchair skills. Interventions to address low self-efficacy and/or offset the discordant self-efficacy/skill profiles are warranted.
评估轮椅移动能力低下和自我管理自我效能感的患病率,并评估其与轮椅技能的相关性。
横断面研究。
社区。
来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省和魁北克省、年龄≥50岁(平均59.7±7.5岁)的社区居家手动轮椅使用者(N = 123)。
无。
采用轮椅使用信心量表简版中的13项移动能力分量表和8项自我管理分量表(标准化分数范围为0 - 100)测量自我效能感,采用32项轮椅技能测试问卷版(分数范围为0 - 100)测量轮椅技能。以50分为界区分自我效能感高和低的个体,以72分为界区分轮椅技能高和低的个体。
轮椅移动能力低下和自我管理自我效能感低下的患病率分别为28.5%(95%置信区间[CI],20.6 - 36.4)和11.4%(95%CI,5.8 - 17.0),它们与轮椅技能的双变量相关性分别为r = 0.70和r = 0.39。在样本中,16%的人报告移动自我效能感和技能分数不一致;25%的人报告自我效能感低但技能高。在参与者中,30%的人报告自我管理自我效能感和轮椅技能分数不一致,8.1%的人报告自我效能感低于技能。
该样本中自我效能感低下的情况相对较高,且与轮椅技能不一致。有必要采取干预措施来解决自我效能感低下和/或抵消自我效能感/技能不匹配的情况。