Wundersitz D W T, Gastin P B, Robertson S, Davey P C, Netto K J
Centre for Exercise and Sports Science, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin Univeristy, Melbourne, Australia.
Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;36(9):742-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547265. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
This study assessed the validity of an accelerometer to measure impacts in team sports. 76 participants completed a team sport circuit. Accelerations were collected concurrently at 100 Hz using an accelerometer and a 36-camera motion analysis system. The largest peak accelerations per movement were compared in 2 ways: i) pooled together and filtered at 13 different cut-off frequencies (range 6-25 Hz) to identify the optimal filtering frequency, and ii) the optimal cut-off frequency split into the 7 movements performed (n=532). Raw and 25-16 Hz filtering frequencies significantly overestimated and 6 Hz underestimated motion analysis peak accelerations (P <0.007). The 12 Hz filtered accelerometer data revealed the strongest relationship with motion analysis data (accuracy - 0.01±0.27 g, effect size - 0.01, agreement - 0.55 to 0.53 g, precision 0.27 g, and relative error 5.5%; P=1.00). The accelerometer underestimated peak accelerations during tackling and jumping, and overestimated during walking, jogging, sprinting and change of direction. Lower agreement and reduced precision were associated with sprinting, jumping and tackling. The accelerometer demonstrated an acceptable level of concurrent validity compared to a motion analysis system when filtered at a cut-off frequency of 12 Hz. The results advocate the use of accelerometers to measure movements in team sport.
本研究评估了一种加速度计在团队运动中测量撞击的有效性。76名参与者完成了一项团队运动循环测试。使用加速度计和36台摄像机的运动分析系统同时以100Hz的频率采集加速度数据。对每个动作的最大峰值加速度进行了两种方式的比较:i)汇总并在13个不同截止频率(范围6 - 25Hz)下进行滤波,以确定最佳滤波频率;ii)将最佳截止频率应用于所执行的7个动作(n = 532)。原始数据和25 - 16Hz滤波频率显著高估了运动分析的峰值加速度,而6Hz则低估了(P < 0.007)。12Hz滤波后的加速度计数据与运动分析数据显示出最强的相关性(准确性 - 0.01±0.27g,效应大小 - 0.01,一致性 - 0.55至0.53g,精度0.27g,相对误差5.5%;P = 1.00)。加速度计在擒抱和跳跃时低估了峰值加速度,而在行走、慢跑、冲刺和变向时高估了。较低的一致性和精度与冲刺、跳跃和擒抱有关。当以12Hz的截止频率进行滤波时,与运动分析系统相比,加速度计显示出可接受的同时效度水平。研究结果支持使用加速度计来测量团队运动中的动作。