Selb B, Baumeister H G, Maass G, Doerr H W
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;4(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02148658.
The results of RNA analysis for the detection of rotavirus were compared with those of a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and electron microscopy using 212 faecal specimens obtained from 200 children with gastroenteritis. Rotavirus was extracted directly from faecal specimens and RNA segments were made visible by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a silver staining technique. Of the 212 faecal specimens 137 were found to be positive in ELISA, 125 in RNA analysis and 121 in both methods. Forty-nine of the 212 specimens were also investigated by electron microscopy. Thirty-five were positive when examined by electron microscopy, 37 were positive in ELISA and 33 in RNA analysis. RNA analysis of 119 faecal samples in outbreaks and sporadic cases of rotavirus infection yielded 42 different rotavirus electrophoretypes. The results indicated that no one method was sufficient to detect all positive specimens and that RNA analysis is useful in epidemiological studies.
采用从200名患肠胃炎儿童获取的212份粪便标本,将用于检测轮状病毒的RNA分析结果与标准酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和电子显微镜检查的结果进行比较。轮状病毒直接从粪便标本中提取,RNA片段通过使用银染技术的聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳使其可见。在212份粪便标本中,ELISA检测出137份呈阳性,RNA分析检测出125份呈阳性,两种方法均检测出121份呈阳性。对212份标本中的49份也进行了电子显微镜检查。电子显微镜检查时35份呈阳性,ELISA检测出37份呈阳性,RNA分析检测出33份呈阳性。对119份轮状病毒感染暴发和散发病例的粪便样本进行RNA分析,得到42种不同的轮状病毒电泳类型。结果表明,没有一种方法足以检测出所有阳性标本,且RNA分析在流行病学研究中很有用。