Karunadharma Pabalu P, Basisty Nathan, Dai Dao-Fu, Chiao Ying A, Quarles Ellen K, Hsieh Edward J, Crispin David, Bielas Jason H, Ericson Nolan G, Beyer Richard P, MacKay Vivian L, MacCoss Michael J, Rabinovitch Peter S
Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Aging Cell. 2015 Aug;14(4):547-57. doi: 10.1111/acel.12317. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Calorie restriction (CR) and rapamycin (RP) extend lifespan and improve health across model organisms. Both treatments inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, a conserved longevity pathway and a key regulator of protein homeostasis, yet their effects on proteome homeostasis are relatively unknown. To comprehensively study the effects of aging, CR, and RP on protein homeostasis, we performed the first simultaneous measurement of mRNA translation, protein turnover, and abundance in livers of young (3 month) and old (25 month) mice subjected to 10-week RP or 40% CR. Protein abundance and turnover were measured in vivo using (2) H3 -leucine heavy isotope labeling followed by LC-MS/MS, and translation was assessed by polysome profiling. We observed 35-60% increased protein half-lives after CR and 15% increased half-lives after RP compared to age-matched controls. Surprisingly, the effects of RP and CR on protein turnover and abundance differed greatly between canonical pathways, with opposite effects in mitochondrial (mt) dysfunction and eIF2 signaling pathways. CR most closely recapitulated the young phenotype in the top pathways. Polysome profiles indicated that CR reduced polysome loading while RP increased polysome loading in young and old mice, suggesting distinct mechanisms of reduced protein synthesis. CR and RP both attenuated protein oxidative damage. Our findings collectively suggest that CR and RP extend lifespan in part through the reduction of protein synthetic burden and damage and a concomitant increase in protein quality. However, these results challenge the notion that RP is a faithful CR mimetic and highlight mechanistic differences between the two interventions.
卡路里限制(CR)和雷帕霉素(RP)可延长多种模式生物的寿命并改善其健康状况。这两种处理均抑制雷帕霉素靶蛋白(mTOR)信号传导,这是一条保守的长寿途径,也是蛋白质稳态的关键调节因子,但其对蛋白质组稳态的影响相对未知。为了全面研究衰老、CR和RP对蛋白质稳态的影响,我们首次同时测量了接受10周RP处理或40%CR处理的年轻(3个月)和年老(25个月)小鼠肝脏中的mRNA翻译、蛋白质周转和丰度。使用(2)H3-亮氨酸重同位素标记,随后进行液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在体内测量蛋白质丰度和周转,并通过多核糖体谱分析评估翻译情况。与年龄匹配的对照组相比,我们观察到CR后蛋白质半衰期增加了35%-60%,RP后增加了15%。令人惊讶的是,RP和CR对蛋白质周转和丰度的影响在经典途径之间差异很大,在线粒体(mt)功能障碍和eIF2信号通路中具有相反的影响。在顶级途径中,CR最接近重现年轻表型。多核糖体谱表明,CR降低了年轻和年老小鼠的多核糖体负载,而RP增加了多核糖体负载,这表明蛋白质合成减少的机制不同。CR和RP均减轻了蛋白质氧化损伤。我们的研究结果共同表明,CR和RP部分通过减轻蛋白质合成负担和损伤以及同时提高蛋白质质量来延长寿命。然而,这些结果挑战了RP是忠实的CR模拟物这一观点,并突出了这两种干预措施之间的机制差异。