Mubang Ronnie N, Stoltzfus Jill C, Cohen Marissa S, Hoey Brian A, Stehly Christy D, Evans David C, Jones Christian, Papadimos Thomas J, Grell Jennifer, Hoff William S, Thomas Peter, Cipolla James, Stawicki Stanislaw P
Department of Surgery, St Luke's University Health Network, 801 Ostrum Street, NW2 Administration, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2068-75. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3041-5.
Traditional injury severity assessment is insufficient in estimating the morbidity and mortality risk for older (≥45 years) trauma patients. Commonly used tools involve complex calculations or tables, do not consider all comorbidities, and often rely on data that are not available early in the trauma patient's hospitalization. The comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS), a sum of all pre-injury medications and comorbidities, was found in previous studies to independently predict morbidity and mortality in this older patient population. However, these studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes. Consequently, we sought to validate previous research findings in a large, administrative dataset.
A retrospective study of patients ages≥45 years was performed using an administrative trauma database from St. Luke's University Hospital's Level I Trauma Center. The study period was from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2013. Abstracted data included patient demographics, injury mechanism and severity [injury characteristics and severity score (ISS)], Glasgow coma scale (GCS), hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (HLOS and ILOS, respectively), morbidity, post-discharge destination, and in-hospital mortality. Univariate analyses were conducted with mortality, all-cause morbidity, and discharge destination as primary end-points. Variables reaching statistical significance (p≤0.20) were included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Data are presented as adjusted odds ratios (AORs), with p<0.05 denoting statistical significance.
A total of 5863 patient records were analyzed. Average patient age was 68.5±15.3 years (52% male, 89% blunt mechanism, mean GCS 14.3). Mean HLOS and ILOS increased significantly with increasing CPS (p<0.01). Independent predictors of mortality included age (AOR 1.05, p<0.01), CPS (per-unit AOR 1.08, p<0.02), GCS (AOR 1.43 per-unit decrease, p<0.01), and ISS (per-unit 1.08, p<0.01). Independent predictors of all-cause morbidity included age (AOR 1.02, p<0.01), GCS (AOR per-unit decrease 1.08, p<0.01), ISS (per-unit AOR 1.09, p<0.01), and CPS (per-unit AOR 1.04, p<0.01). CPS did not independently predict need for discharge to a facility.
This study confirms that CPS is an independent predictor of all-cause morbidity and mortality in older trauma patients. However, CPS was not independently associated with need for discharge to a facility. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the use of CPS as a predictive and interventional tool, with special focus on correlations between specific pre-existing conditions, pharmacologic interactions, and morbidity/mortality patterns.
传统的损伤严重程度评估在估计老年(≥45岁)创伤患者的发病和死亡风险方面存在不足。常用工具涉及复杂计算或表格,未考虑所有合并症,且常常依赖创伤患者住院早期无法获取的数据。合并症 - 多种药物使用评分(CPS),即损伤前所有药物和合并症的总和,在先前研究中被发现可独立预测该老年患者群体的发病和死亡情况。然而,这些研究受限于相对较小的样本量。因此,我们试图在一个大型管理数据集中验证先前的研究结果。
使用圣卢克大学医院一级创伤中心的管理创伤数据库,对年龄≥45岁的患者进行回顾性研究。研究时间段为2008年1月1日至2013年12月31日。提取的数据包括患者人口统计学信息、损伤机制和严重程度[损伤特征和严重程度评分(ISS)]、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、住院时间和重症监护病房住院时间(分别为HLOS和ILOS)、发病情况、出院后去向以及院内死亡率。以死亡率、全因发病情况和出院去向作为主要终点进行单因素分析。具有统计学意义(p≤0.20)的变量被纳入多因素逻辑回归模型。数据以调整比值比(AOR)表示,p<0.05表示具有统计学意义。
共分析了5863份患者记录。患者平均年龄为68.5±15.3岁(52%为男性,89%为钝性机制损伤,平均GCS为14.3)。随着CPS升高,平均HLOS和ILOS显著增加(p<0.01)。死亡率的独立预测因素包括年龄(AOR 1.05,p<0.01)、CPS(每单位AOR 1.08,p<0.02)、GCS(每降低一个单位AOR 1.43,p<0.01)和ISS(每单位1.08,p<0.01)。全因发病情况的独立预测因素包括年龄(AOR 1.02,p<0.01)、GCS(每降低一个单位AOR 1.08,p<0.01)、ISS(每单位AOR 1.09,p<0.01)和CPS(每单位AOR 1.04,p<0.01)。CPS不能独立预测出院至医疗机构的需求。
本研究证实CPS是老年创伤患者全因发病和死亡的独立预测因素。然而,CPS与出院至医疗机构的需求无独立相关性。需要进行前瞻性多中心研究以评估CPS作为预测和干预工具的应用,特别关注特定既往疾病、药物相互作用与发病/死亡模式之间的相关性。