Gannon Bryan M, Tanumihardjo Sherry A
Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
J Nutr. 2015 May;145(5):847-54. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.208132. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
Vitamin A plays an essential role in animal biology and has negative effects associated with both hypo- and hypervitaminosis A. Many notable interventions are being done globally to eliminate vitamin A deficiency, including supplementation, fortification, and biofortification. At the same time, it is important to monitor vitamin A status in nations where preformed vitamin A intake is high because of consumption of animal source foods (e.g., liver, dairy, eggs), fortified foods (e.g., milk, cereals, oil, sugar, margarine), or vitamin supplements (e.g., one-a-day multivitamins) to ensure the population does not reach hypervitaminosis A. To accurately assess population status and evaluate interventions aimed at improving vitamin A status, accurate assessment methods are needed. The primary storage site of vitamin A is the liver; however, routinely obtaining liver samples from humans is impractical and unethical. Isotope dilution using deuterium- or (13)C-labeled retinol is currently the most sensitive indirect biomarker of vitamin A status across a wide range of liver reserves. The major drawback to its application is the increased technicality in sample analysis and data calculations when compared to less sensitive methodology, such as serum retinol concentrations and dose response tests. Two main equations have emerged for calculating vitamin A body pool size or liver concentrations from isotope dilution data: the "Olson equation" and the "mass balance equation." Different applications of these equations can lead to confusion and lack of consistency if the underlying principles and assumptions used are not clarified. The purpose of this focused review is to describe the evolution of the equations used in retinol stable-isotope work and the assumptions appropriate to different applications of the test. Ultimately, the 2 main equations are shown to be fundamentally the same and differ only in assumptions made for each specific research application.
维生素A在动物生物学中起着至关重要的作用,维生素A缺乏症和维生素A过多症都会产生负面影响。全球正在开展许多显著的干预措施来消除维生素A缺乏症,包括补充、强化和生物强化。与此同时,在那些由于食用动物源食品(如肝脏、乳制品、蛋类)、强化食品(如牛奶、谷物、油、糖、人造黄油)或维生素补充剂(如复合维生素片)而导致预形成维生素A摄入量较高的国家,监测维生素A状况非常重要,以确保人群不会出现维生素A过多症。为了准确评估人群状况并评估旨在改善维生素A状况的干预措施,需要准确的评估方法。维生素A的主要储存部位是肝脏;然而,常规从人体获取肝脏样本既不实际也不符合伦理。使用氘或碳-13标记的视黄醇进行同位素稀释,目前是在广泛的肝脏储备范围内维生素A状况最敏感的间接生物标志物。与血清视黄醇浓度和剂量反应试验等不太敏感的方法相比,其应用的主要缺点是样本分析和数据计算的技术难度增加。从同位素稀释数据计算维生素A身体储备量或肝脏浓度出现了两个主要方程:“奥尔森方程”和“质量平衡方程”。如果不阐明所使用的基本原理和假设,这些方程的不同应用可能会导致混淆和缺乏一致性。本重点综述的目的是描述视黄醇稳定同位素研究中使用的方程的演变以及适用于该测试不同应用的假设。最终,这两个主要方程在根本上是相同的,只是在针对每个具体研究应用所做的假设上有所不同。