• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培育更优质的大脑?英国社会与福利政策中的怀孕与神经科学论述

Growing better brains? Pregnancy and neuroscience discourses in English social and welfare policies.

作者信息

Lowe Pam, Lee Ellie, Macvarish Jan

机构信息

School of Languages and Social Science, Aston University , Birmingham , UK.

School of Sociology Social Policy and Social Research, University of Kent , Canterbury , UK.

出版信息

Health Risk Soc. 2015 Jan 2;17(1):15-29. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2014.994479. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1080/13698575.2014.994479
PMID:25810690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4353307/
Abstract

In recent years, English welfare and health policy has started to include pregnancy within the foundation stage of child development. The foetus is also increasingly designated as 'at risk' from pregnant women. In this article, we draw on an analysis of a purposive sample of English social and welfare policies and closely related advocacy documents to trace the emergence of neuroscientific claims-making in relation to the family. In this article, we show that a specific deterministic understanding of the developing brain that only has a loose relationship with current scientific evidence is an important component in these changes. We examine the ways in which pregnancy is situated in these debates. In these debates, maternal stress is identified as a risk to the foetus; however, the selective concern with women living in disadvantage undermines biological claims. The policy claim of neurological 'critical windows' also seems to be influenced by social concerns. Hence, these emerging concerns over the foetus' developing brain seem to be situated within the gendered history of policing women's pregnant bodies rather than acting on new insights from scientific discoveries. By situating these developments within the broader framework of risk consciousness, we can link these changes to wider understandings of the 'at risk' child and intensified surveillance over family life.

摘要

近年来,英国的福利与健康政策已开始将孕期纳入儿童发育的基础阶段。胎儿也越来越多地被认定为受到孕妇的“威胁”。在本文中,我们通过对英国社会和福利政策以及密切相关的倡导文件的目标样本进行分析,来追溯与家庭相关的神经科学主张的出现。在本文中,我们表明,对发育中大脑的一种特定的决定论理解(这种理解与当前科学证据仅有松散的联系)是这些变化的一个重要组成部分。我们审视了孕期在这些辩论中的定位方式。在这些辩论中,母体压力被认定为对胎儿的一种风险;然而,对处于不利地位女性的选择性关注削弱了生物学主张。神经学“关键窗口期”的政策主张似乎也受到社会关注的影响。因此,这些对胎儿发育中大脑的新关注似乎处于监管女性孕期身体的性别化历史之中,而非基于科学发现的新见解。通过将这些发展置于风险意识的更广泛框架内,我们可以将这些变化与对“处于风险”儿童的更广泛理解以及对家庭生活的强化监控联系起来。

相似文献

1
Growing better brains? Pregnancy and neuroscience discourses in English social and welfare policies.培育更优质的大脑?英国社会与福利政策中的怀孕与神经科学论述
Health Risk Soc. 2015 Jan 2;17(1):15-29. doi: 10.1080/13698575.2014.994479. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
2
Biologising parenting: neuroscience discourse, English social and public health policy and understandings of the child.育儿的生物化:神经科学话语、英国社会与公共卫生政策及对儿童的理解
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Feb;37(2):198-211. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12223. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Abortion policy and women's health in developing countries.发展中国家的堕胎政策与妇女健康
Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(2):297-314. doi: 10.2190/V08N-UE7N-TNBH-RA4P.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
How Maternal Nutritional and Mental Health Affects Child Health During Pregnancy: A Narrative Review.孕期母亲营养与心理健康如何影响儿童健康:一项叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48763. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48763. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Depressing time: Waiting, melancholia, and the psychoanalytic practice of care压抑的时光:等待、忧郁与精神分析的关怀实践
7
Targeting brains, producing responsibilities: the use of neuroscience within British social policy.瞄准大脑,产生责任:神经科学在英国社会政策中的应用。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;132:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].[法庭上的神经科学:从责任到危险性,法国新法律引发的伦理问题]
Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Core state preconception health indicators - pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009.核心孕前健康指标 - 妊娠风险评估监测系统和行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Apr 25;63(3):1-62.
10
Maternal bodies and medicines: a commentary on risk and decision-making of pregnant and breastfeeding women and health professionals.母体与药物:对孕妇、哺乳期妇女和卫生专业人员的风险与决策的评论。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Nov 25;11 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S5-S5.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk messages relating to fertility and pregnancy: a media content analysis.与生育和怀孕相关的风险信息:一项媒体内容分析
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 14;6:114. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16744.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Neurobiological limits and the somatic significance of love: Caregivers' engagements with neuroscience in Scottish parenting programmes.神经生物学限制与爱的躯体意义:苏格兰育儿项目中照顾者与神经科学的互动
Hist Human Sci. 2020 Dec;33(5):85-109. doi: 10.1177/0952695120945966. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
(Low) Expectations, Legitimization, and the Contingent Uses of Scientific Knowledge: Engagements with Neuroscience in Scottish Social Policy and Services.(低)期望、合法化与科学知识的偶然用途:苏格兰社会政策与服务中与神经科学的互动
Engag Sci Technol Soc. 2015;1:47-66.

本文引用的文献

1
Biologising parenting: neuroscience discourse, English social and public health policy and understandings of the child.育儿的生物化:神经科学话语、英国社会与公共卫生政策及对儿童的理解
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Feb;37(2):198-211. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12223. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Infant mental health promotion and the discourse of risk.促进婴幼儿心理健康与风险话语。
Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Mar;36(3):416-31. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12074. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
3
Arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women in the United States, 1973-2005: implications for women's legal status and public health.美国 1973-2005 年对孕妇的逮捕和强制干预:对妇女法律地位和公共卫生的影响。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013 Apr;38(2):299-343. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1966324. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
4
Neuroscience in the public sphere.神经科学在公共领域。
Neuron. 2012 Apr 26;74(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.004.
5
Watching over baby: expectant parenthood and the duty to be well.守护宝宝:准父母身份与保持健康的责任。
Sociol Inq. 2011;81(3):285-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682x.2011.00377.x.
6
III. Deprivation-specific psychological patterns.三、特定剥夺的心理模式。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2010 Apr;75(1):48-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2010.00550.x.
7
Incidence of specific absolute neurocognitive impairment in globally intact children with histories of early severe deprivation.有早期严重剥夺史的全球健康儿童中特定绝对神经认知障碍的发病率。
Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;14(5):453-69. doi: 10.1080/09297040802244136. Epub 2008 Aug 4.
8
Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids and the programming of the brain.产前应激、糖皮质激素与大脑编程
J Neuroendocrinol. 2001 Feb;13(2):113-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00601.x.
9
The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens.小猫对单眼闭合生理效应的易感性时期。
J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):419-36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009022.