Suppr超能文献

十一个高负担国家结核病接触者调查干预措施的比较荟萃分析。

Comparative meta-analysis of tuberculosis contact investigation interventions in eleven high burden countries.

作者信息

Blok Lucie, Sahu Suvanand, Creswell Jacob, Alba Sandra, Stevens Robert, Bakker Mirjam I

机构信息

Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen (KIT) Health, 1090HA Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Stop TB Partnership, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0119822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119822. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening of household contacts of tuberculosis (TB) patients is a recommended strategy to improve early case detection. While it has been widely implemented in low prevalence countries, the most optimal protocols for contact investigation in high prevalence, low resource settings is yet to be determined. This study evaluated contact investigation interventions in eleven lower and middle income countries and reviewed the association between context or program-related factors and the yield of cases among contacts.

METHODS

We reviewed data from nineteen first wave TB REACH funded projects piloting innovations to improve case detection. These nineteen had fulfilled the eligibility criteria: contact investigation implementation and complete data reporting. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the percentage yield and case notifications for each project. Implementation strategies were delineated and the association between independent variables and yield was analyzed by fitting a random effects logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Overall, the nineteen interventions screened 139,052 household contacts, showing great heterogeneity in the percentage yield of microscopy confirmed cases (SS+), ranging from 0.1% to 6.2%). Compared to the most restrictive testing criteria (at least two weeks of cough) the aOR's for lesser (any TB related symptom) and least (all contacts) restrictive testing criteria were 1.71 (95%CI 0.94-3.13) and 6.90 (95% CI 3.42-13.93) respectively. The aOR for inclusion of SS- and extra-pulmonary TB was 0.31 (95% CI 0.15-0.62) compared to restricting index cases to SS+ TB. Contact investigation contributed between <1% and 14% to all SS+ cases diagnosed in the intervention areas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that high numbers of active TB cases can be identified through contact investigation in a variety of contexts. However, design and program implementation factors appear to influence the yield of contact investigation and its concomitant contribution to TB case detection.

摘要

背景

对结核病(TB)患者的家庭接触者进行筛查是一项推荐的策略,以改善早期病例发现。虽然该策略已在低发病率国家广泛实施,但在高发病率、资源匮乏地区进行接触者调查的最佳方案尚未确定。本研究评估了11个中低收入国家的接触者调查干预措施,并审查了背景或项目相关因素与接触者中病例检出率之间的关联。

方法

我们回顾了19个由“结核病防治扩大计划(TB REACH)”首轮资助的项目数据,这些项目试点创新措施以改善病例发现。这19个项目符合入选标准:实施接触者调查并完整报告数据。我们对每个项目的检出率百分比和病例通报情况进行了横断面分析。明确了实施策略,并通过拟合随机效应逻辑回归分析自变量与检出率之间的关联。

结果

总体而言,这19项干预措施筛查了139,052名家庭接触者,痰涂片阳性确诊病例(SS+)的检出率百分比存在很大差异,范围从0.1%至6.2%。与最严格的检测标准(至少咳嗽两周)相比,较宽松(任何与结核病相关症状)和最宽松(所有接触者)检测标准的调整后比值比(aOR)分别为1.71(95%置信区间0.94 - 3.13)和6.90(95%置信区间3.42 - 13.93)。与将索引病例限制为痰涂片阳性结核病相比,纳入痰涂片阴性和肺外结核病的aOR为0.31(95%置信区间0.15 - 0.62)。接触者调查对干预地区所有痰涂片阳性病例诊断的贡献率在<1%至14%之间。

结论

本研究证实,通过接触者调查可在各种情况下识别出大量活动性结核病病例。然而,设计和项目实施因素似乎会影响接触者调查的检出率及其对结核病病例发现的相应贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87d7/4374904/20b69e1dbcb6/pone.0119822.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验