Kumar S, Rathi V, Rattan A, Chaudhary S, Agarwal N
Department of General Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi 95, India.
Department of Radio-diagnosis, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Dilshad Garden, New Delhi 95, India.
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1749-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.028. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
Post-traumatic residual haemothorax (RH) is common and carries significant morbidity. However, its optimal treatment is not clear.
The aim of this study was to find the extent of this problem and the choice of treatment between VATS and intra-pleural streptokinase instillation (IPSI).
This RCT, conducted over 18 months period, included all patients of chest trauma between 18 and 70 years of age, admitted with haemothorax or haemopneumothorax requiring inter-costal drain (ICD) insertion. 154 events of haemothorax/haemopneumothorax requiring ICD insertion were enrolled. RH was seen in 48 (31%) patients: 13 patients were excluded from RCT after refusal for treatment. Seventeen (49%) patients of remaining 35 RH cases were randomized to IPSI group and 18 (51%) patients were randomized to VATS group. The outcome parameters were resolution of RH and treatment related complications.
RH resolved equally well in VATS and IPSI group [13 patients (72%) versus 12 patients (71%), respectively; continuity-adjusted p=1]. Morbidity wise no difference (p-value 0.529) was seen in the two groups.
Post-traumatic RH is seen in 1/3rd patients and is equally well treated by VATS and IPSI.
创伤后残留血胸(RH)很常见,且具有较高的发病率。然而,其最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是确定这一问题的严重程度,以及在电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)和胸膜腔内注入链激酶(IPSI)之间选择哪种治疗方法。
这项随机对照试验历时18个月,纳入了所有年龄在18至70岁之间因血胸或血气胸需要插入肋间引流管(ICD)而入院的胸部创伤患者。共纳入154例需要插入ICD的血胸/血气胸病例。48例(31%)患者出现RH:13例患者在拒绝治疗后被排除在随机对照试验之外。其余35例RH病例中的17例(49%)患者被随机分配到IPSI组,18例(51%)患者被随机分配到VATS组。观察指标为RH的消退情况和治疗相关并发症。
VATS组和IPSI组的RH消退情况同样良好[分别为13例(72%)和12例(71%);连续性校正p = 1]。两组在发病率方面无差异(p值为0.529)。
三分之一的患者会出现创伤后RH,VATS和IPSI对其治疗效果相同。