Rømer Thomsen Kristine, Whybrow Peter C, Kringelbach Morten L
Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), University of Aarhus Aarhus, Denmark ; Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford Oxford, UK ; Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research, School of Business and Social Sciences, University of Aarhus Aarhus, Denmark.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, LA, USA.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Mar 11;9:49. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00049. eCollection 2015.
Anhedonia, the lack of pleasure, has been shown to be a critical feature of a range of psychiatric disorders. Yet, it is currently measured primarily through subjective self-reports and as such has been difficult to submit to rigorous scientific analysis. New insights from affective neuroscience hold considerable promise in improving our understanding of anhedonia and for providing useful objective behavioral measures to complement traditional self-report measures, potentially leading to better diagnoses and novel treatments. Here, we review the state-of-the-art of hedonia research and specifically the established mechanisms of wanting, liking, and learning. Based on this framework we propose to conceptualize anhedonia as impairments in some or all of these processes, thereby departing from the longstanding view of anhedonia as solely reduced subjective experience of pleasure. We discuss how deficits in each of the reward components can lead to different expressions, or subtypes, of anhedonia affording novel ways of measurement. Specifically, we review evidence suggesting that patients suffering from depression and schizophrenia show impairments in wanting and learning, while some aspects of conscious liking seem surprisingly intact. Furthermore, the evidence suggests that anhedonia is heterogeneous across psychiatric disorders, depending on which parts of the pleasure networks are most affected. This in turn has implications for diagnosis and treatment of anhedonia.
快感缺失,即缺乏愉悦感,已被证明是一系列精神疾病的关键特征。然而,目前主要通过主观自我报告来衡量,因此难以进行严格的科学分析。情感神经科学的新见解在增进我们对快感缺失的理解以及提供有用的客观行为测量方法以补充传统自我报告测量方法方面具有巨大潜力,这可能会带来更好的诊断和新的治疗方法。在此,我们回顾了快感研究的最新进展,特别是关于欲望、喜好和学习的既定机制。基于这一框架,我们建议将快感缺失概念化为这些过程中某些或全部的损伤,从而背离了长期以来将快感缺失仅仅视为主观愉悦体验减少的观点。我们讨论了每个奖励成分的缺陷如何导致快感缺失的不同表现形式或亚型,从而提供了新的测量方法。具体而言,我们回顾了证据表明,患有抑郁症和精神分裂症的患者在欲望和学习方面存在损伤,而有意识的喜好的某些方面似乎出人意料地完好无损。此外,证据表明快感缺失在精神疾病中具有异质性,这取决于快感网络的哪些部分受影响最大。这反过来又对快感缺失的诊断和治疗产生影响。