• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《仙台与福冈共识指南:可疑胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤患者的高级别肿瘤》

Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017
PMID:25818077
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about whether the 2006 Sendai guidelines or 2012 Fukuoka guidelines are being used to determine the level of risk posed by suspected pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms (PCNs). We evaluated whether the guidelines accurately predicted which patients with suspected PCNs, which was based on cross-sectional imaging findings, would be found to have advanced neoplasia in surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of data collected from 194 patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas, which were assessed by cross-sectional imaging analyses, who underwent surgery for suspected PCNs at the Hospital at the University of Pennsylvania from 2000 through 2008. Imaging data were used to classify patients according to the Sendai guidelines as high risk or low risk and according to the Fukuoka guidelines as high risk, worrisome, or low risk. Pathology analyses of samples collected during surgery were used as the reference. A logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with advanced neoplasia. The Sendai and Fukuoka guideline criteria were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Advanced neoplasias were found in 36 patients (18.5%; 22 invasive cancers and 14 high-grade dysplasias). The median size of cysts was 33 mm. All patients found to have invasive cancers were accurately assigned to the Sendai guidelines high risk or Fukuoka guidelines high risk groups. However, 3 patients in the Sendai guidelines low risk and 2 patients in the Fukuoka guidelines low risk groups were found to have high-grade dysplasia. The Sendai guidelines identified patients with advanced neoplasia with 91.7% sensitivity, 21.5% specificity, 21% positive predictive value, and 91.9% negative predictive value. A designation of Fukuoka guidelines high risk identified patients with advanced neoplasia with 55.6% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 32% positive predictive value, and 87.9% negative predictive value. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the guidelines in predicting which patients had advanced neoplasia. On multivariate analysis, the presence of a mural nodule (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-6.27; P = .008), dilated main pancreatic duct >10 mm (OR, 7.44; 95% CI, 2.36-23.52; P = .001), or enhancing solid component (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.16-7.64; P = .02) were associated with detection of advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cysts.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of a retrospective analysis, the Sendai and Fukuoka guidelines accurately determine which patients with pancreatic cysts have advanced neoplasia. The guidelines accurately recommended surgical resection for all patients found to have invasive cancer, although some patients with high-grade dysplasia were missed. The updated Fukuoka guidelines are not superior to the Sendai guidelines in identifying neoplasias. Cyst size was not associated with advanced neoplasia.

摘要

背景与目的

对于疑似胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤(PCN),我们知之甚少,其风险水平是依据 2006 年仙台指南还是 2012 年福冈指南来确定。我们评估了这些指南是否准确预测了哪些疑似 PCN 患者(基于横断面影像学发现)在手术后会发现存在高级别肿瘤。

方法

我们对 194 例胰腺囊性病变患者的数据进行了回顾性研究,这些患者的影像学检查发现有可疑的 PCN,在宾夕法尼亚大学附属医院于 2000 年至 2008 年间接受了手术治疗。影像学数据用于根据仙台指南将患者分为高危或低危,根据福冈指南分为高危、有顾虑或低危。手术过程中采集的样本进行病理学分析作为参考。创建了一个逻辑回归模型来确定与高级别肿瘤相关的因素。对仙台和福冈指南标准进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

36 例患者(18.5%;22 例侵袭性癌症和 14 例高级别异型增生)发现高级别肿瘤。囊肿的中位大小为 33 毫米。所有发现侵袭性癌症的患者都被准确地分配到了仙台指南高危或福冈指南高危组。然而,3 例仙台指南低危患者和 2 例福冈指南低危患者被发现存在高级别异型增生。仙台指南诊断出高级别肿瘤的敏感性为 91.7%,特异性为 21.5%,阳性预测值为 21%,阴性预测值为 91.9%。福冈指南高危的诊断敏感性为 55.6%,特异性为 73%,阳性预测值为 32%,阴性预测值为 87.9%。总体而言,这些指南在预测哪些患者存在高级别肿瘤方面没有统计学上的显著差异。多变量分析显示,存在壁结节(比值比 [OR],2.88;95%置信区间 [CI],1.33-6.27;P =.008)、主胰管扩张>10 毫米(OR,7.44;95% CI,2.36-23.52;P =.001)或增强实性成分(OR,2.92;95% CI,1.16-7.64;P =.02)与胰腺囊肿中高级别肿瘤的检测有关。

结论

基于回顾性分析,仙台和福冈指南能够准确确定哪些胰腺囊肿患者存在高级别肿瘤。这些指南准确地建议对所有发现侵袭性癌症的患者进行手术切除,尽管一些高级别异型增生患者被遗漏。更新的福冈指南在识别肿瘤方面并不优于仙台指南。囊肿大小与高级别肿瘤无关。

相似文献

1
Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.《仙台与福冈共识指南:可疑胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤患者的高级别肿瘤》
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
2
Comparing American Gastroenterological Association Pancreatic Cyst Management Guidelines with Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines as Predictors of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.比较美国胃肠病学会胰腺囊肿管理指南与福冈共识指南对疑似胰腺囊性肿瘤患者高级别肿瘤的预测价值
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Nov;223(5):729-737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
3
Fukuoka and AGA Criteria Have Superior Diagnostic Accuracy for Advanced Cystic Neoplasms than Sendai Criteria.福冈标准和美国胃肠病学会(AGA)标准对晚期囊性肿瘤的诊断准确性优于仙台标准。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):626-632. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4460-y. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Validation of Sendai and Fukuoka consensus guidelines in predicting malignancy in patients with preoperatively diagnosed mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms.验证仙台和福冈共识指南对术前诊断为黏液性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者恶性肿瘤的预测价值。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;117(3):409-416. doi: 10.1002/jso.24882. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
5
Are the Sendai and Fukuoka consensus guidelines for cystic mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas useful in the initial triage of all suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms? A single-institution experience with 317 surgically-treated patients.《仙台和福冈关于胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤的共识指南对所有疑似胰腺囊性肿瘤的初始分诊是否有用?一项针对317例接受手术治疗患者的单机构经验》
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):1919-26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3501-4. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
6
Evaluation of the Sendai and 2012 International Consensus Guidelines based on cross-sectional imaging findings performed for the initial triage of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas: a single institution experience with 114 surgically treated patients.基于用于胰腺黏液性囊性病变初始分诊的横断面成像结果对仙台和2012年国际共识指南的评估:一家机构对114例接受手术治疗患者的经验
Am J Surg. 2014 Aug;208(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.031. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
7
Validation of the clinical utility of 4 guidelines in the initial triage of mucinous cystic lesions of the pancreas based on cross-sectional imaging: Experience with 188 surgically-treated patients.基于横断面影像学的 4 项指南在胰腺黏液性囊性病变初步分诊中的临床实用性验证:188 例手术治疗患者的经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;46(11):2114-2121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
8
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
9
International consensus guidelines for surgical resection of mucinous neoplasms cannot be applied to all cystic lesions of the pancreas.国际共识指南对于黏液性肿瘤的外科切除并不能适用于所有胰腺囊性病变。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.026. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
10
The Sendai and Fukuoka consensus criteria for the management of branch duct IPMN - A meta-analysis on their accuracy.用于分支胰管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤管理的仙台和福冈共识标准——关于其准确性的荟萃分析
Pancreatology. 2017 Mar-Apr;17(2):255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Pancreatic Cyst Management: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prediction of Advanced Neoplasms through Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Confocal Endomicroscopy.改善胰腺囊肿管理:通过内镜超声引导共聚焦内镜检查利用人工智能预测高级别肿瘤
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;8(6):496. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8060496.
2
Earlier Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Possible?胰腺癌的早期诊断:是否可行?
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 5;15(18):4430. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184430.
3
Risk Factors for Progression in Patients Undergoing Surveillance for Pancreatic Cysts.
胰腺囊肿患者监测进展的风险因素。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):119-124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005922. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Utility of promoter hypermethylation in malignant risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤中启动子高甲基化在恶性风险分层中的作用。
Clin Epigenetics. 2023 Feb 20;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01429-5.
5
Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.人工智能在胰腺囊性病变管理中的应用。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;7(2):79. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020079.
6
The Ratio of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Is an Independent Predictor of Malignant Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas.C反应蛋白与白蛋白的比值是胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤恶性程度的独立预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2021 May 11;10(10):2058. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102058.
7
Pancreatic Cysts in the Elderly.老年人的胰腺囊肿
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;17(4):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s11938-019-00260-3.
8
Novel Methylated DNA Markers Discriminate Advanced Neoplasia in Pancreatic Cysts: Marker Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Cyst Fluid Testing.新型甲基化 DNA 标志物可区分胰腺囊肿中的高级别肿瘤:标志物发现、组织验证和囊液检测。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;114(9):1539-1549. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000284.
9
Surveillance of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas: Whom and How to Survey?胰腺囊性病变的监测:监测对象及如何监测?
Visc Med. 2018 Jul;34(3):202-205. doi: 10.1159/000489240. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
10
The value of systemic inflammatory markers in identifying malignancy in mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms.全身炎症标志物在黏液性胰腺囊性肿瘤恶性肿瘤识别中的价值。
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 14;8(70):115561-115569. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23310. eCollection 2017 Dec 29.