Moniuszko Anna, Dunaj Justyna, Zajkowska Joanna, Czupryna Piotr, Świerzbińska Renata, Guziejko Katarzyna, Aleksiejczuk Piotr, Barry Gerald, Kondrusik Maciej, Pancewicz Sławomir
Department of Infectious Diseases and Neuroinfections, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland. Head of Department: Prof. Slawomir Pancewicz MD, PhD.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland. Head of Department: Prof. Iwona Flisiak MD, PhD.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2015 Feb;32(1):11-4. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2014.40940. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
Diagnostic methods in erythema migrans are still not standardized.
To evaluate the frequency of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. DNA presence in patients with erythema migrans (EM); to assess the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure for detecting B. burgdorferi s.l. DNA in patients with the skin form of Lyme borreliosis; and to compare the results of the PCR-based method with the traditional ELISA method.
Skin biopsy and blood samples from 93 patients with EM were examined for B. burgdorferi s.l. DNA detection (PCR). Seventy-one of these patients were examined for the presence of anti-B. burgdorferi s.l. antibodies (ELISA).
Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. DNA was detected in 48% of the skin biopsy specimens and in 2% of blood samples. Only 1 patient was PCR positive in both blood and skin samples. Seventy percent of patients whose PCR results were positive were bitten by a tick less than 14 days before. IgM anti-B. burgdorferi s.l - specific antibodies were present in the serum of 35% of patients and IgG antibodies - in 30% of patients. Seventeen percent were positive in both IgM and IgG.
Polymerase chain reaction of skin biopsy specimens seems to be currently the most sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of patients with EM, especially in patients with a short duration of the disease (< 14 days) but still its effectiveness is much lower than expected. Polymerase chain reaction of blood samples cannot be recommended at the present time for the routine diagnostic of patients with EM.
游走性红斑的诊断方法仍未标准化。
评估游走性红斑(EM)患者中伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种(Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.)DNA的存在频率;评估用于检测莱姆病皮肤型患者中伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种DNA的聚合酶链反应(PCR)程序;并将基于PCR的方法结果与传统酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法的结果进行比较。
对93例EM患者的皮肤活检和血液样本进行伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种DNA检测(PCR)。其中71例患者检测了抗伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种抗体(ELISA)。
在48%的皮肤活检标本和2%的血液样本中检测到伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种DNA。只有1例患者的血液和皮肤样本PCR均呈阳性。PCR结果为阳性的患者中有70%在发病前不到14天被蜱叮咬过。35%的患者血清中存在IgM抗伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种特异性抗体,30%的患者存在IgG抗体。17%的患者IgM和IgG均为阳性。
目前,皮肤活检标本的聚合酶链反应似乎是诊断EM患者最敏感和特异的检测方法,尤其是对于病程较短(<14天)的患者,但即便如此其有效性仍远低于预期。目前不推荐将血液样本的聚合酶链反应用于EM患者的常规诊断。