Tsilimingras Dennis, Schnipper Jeffrey, Duke Ashley, Agens John, Quintero Stephen, Bellamy Gail, Janisse James, Helmkamp Laura, Bates David W
Department of Family Medicine & Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3260-3. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
There has been little research to examine post-discharge adverse events (AEs) in rural patients discharged from community hospitals.
We aimed to determine the rate of post-discharge AEs, classify the types of post-discharge AEs, and identify risk factors for post-discharge AEs in urban and rural patients.
This was a prospective cohort study of patients at risk for post-discharge adverse events from December 2011 through October 2012.
Six hundred and eighty-four patients who were under the care of hospitalist physicians and were being discharged home, spoke English, and could be contacted after discharge, were admitted to the medical service. Patients were stratified as urban/rural using zip code of residence. Rural patients were oversampled to ensure equal enrollment of urban and rural patients.
The main outcome of the study was post-discharge AEs based on structured telephone interviews, health record review, and adjudication by two blinded, trained physicians using a previously established methodology.
Over 28% of 684 patients experienced post-discharge AEs, most of which were either preventable or ameliorable. There was no difference in the incidence of post-discharge AEs in urban versus rural patients (ARR 1.04 95% CI 0.82-1.32 ), but post-discharge AEs were associated with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and number of secondary discharge diagnoses only in urban patients.
Post-discharge AEs were common in both urban and rural patients and many were preventable or ameliorable. Potentially different risk factors for AEs in urban versus rural patients suggests the need for further research into the underlying causes. Different interventions may be required in urban versus rural patients to improve patient safety during transitions in care.
针对社区医院出院的农村患者出院后不良事件(AE)的研究较少。
我们旨在确定出院后不良事件的发生率,对出院后不良事件的类型进行分类,并识别城乡患者出院后不良事件 的风险因素。
这是一项对2011年12月至2012年10月有出院后不良事件风险患者的前瞻性队列研究。
684名由住院医师诊治且即将出院回家、说英语且出院后能被联系上的患者被纳入医疗服务。根据居住邮编 将患者分为城市/农村。农村患者被过度抽样以确保城乡患者入组人数相等。
本研究的主要结局是基于结构化电话访谈、健康记录审查以及由两名经过培训的盲法医师采用先前 确立的方法进行判定的出院后不良事件。
684名患者中超过28%经历了出院后不良事件,其中大多数是可预防或可改善的。城乡患者出院后不良事件 的发生率无差异(绝对风险率1.04,95%可信区间0.82 - 1.32),但出院后不良事件仅在城市患者中与高血压、2型糖尿病及出院次要诊断数量相关。
出院后不良事件在城乡患者中均很常见,且许多是可预防或可改善的。城乡患者不良事件潜在的不同风险 因素表明需要进一步研究其潜在原因。城乡患者可能需要不同的干预措施以改善护理转接期间的患者安全。