• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用心理治疗方法治疗原发性高血压患者的临床经济效果]

[Clinicoeconomic effectiveness of using psychotherapy to treat patients with essential hypertension].

作者信息

Kalmatayeva Zh A, Zholamanova A A

机构信息

Higher School of Public Health, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan.

出版信息

Ter Arkh. 2015;87(1):64-68. doi: 10.17116/terarkh201587164-68.

DOI:10.17116/terarkh201587164-68
PMID:25823271
Abstract

AIM

To assess the expediency of psychotherapy in patients with essential hypertension (EH) from clinical and economic standpoints.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seventy-five (37 men, 38 women) with grades 1-2 EH (blood pressure (BP) was 140/90 to 179/109 mm Hg) and the verified psychosomatic background of the disease) were examined and randomized into 2 groups (the mean age in Groups 1 and 2 was 48.5 ± 3.69 and 47.5 ± 4.2 years, respectively). All the patients received medical therapy using the same regimen; however, Group 1 patients had additionally psychotherapy. The decrease in BP and the average number of visits required to reach goal BP were estimated as a criterion for therapeutic effectiveness. A pharmacoeconomic analysis of antihypertensive therapy was made in each group.

RESULTS

The average cost for 24 weeks was 349.67 rbl per person in Group 1 and 435.9 rbl in Group 2, which was 19.78% cheaper. The costs of reductions in systolic-BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were also lower in Group 1 (-22.108 and -39.534 rbl, respectively). At the same time, goal BP was achieved more rapidly in Group 1 (in Groups 1 and 2, the reduction in SBP was 5.28 and 3.38 mm Hg weekly and that in DBP was 2.51 and 1.73 mm Hg weekly, respectively). This makes it possible to lower a physicians' load and to save timing budget (p > 0.032).

CONCLUSION

The treatment policy in Group 1 surpassed that in Group 2 in the rate of BP normalization and the number of required visits to a physician and showed significant economic benefits.

摘要

目的

从临床和经济角度评估心理治疗对原发性高血压(EH)患者的适用性。

对象与方法

选取75例1-2级EH患者(血压为140/90至179/109 mmHg)且疾病的心身背景已得到证实,其中男性37例,女性38例。对这些患者进行检查并随机分为2组(第1组和第2组的平均年龄分别为48.5±3.69岁和47.5±4.2岁)。所有患者均采用相同方案进行药物治疗;然而,第1组患者还接受了心理治疗。将血压降低情况以及达到目标血压所需的平均就诊次数作为治疗效果的标准进行评估。对每组的降压治疗进行了药物经济学分析。

结果

第1组每人24周的平均费用为349.67卢布,第2组为435.9卢布,第1组便宜19.78%。第1组收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)降低的费用也较低(分别为-22.108和-39.534卢布)。同时,第1组更快达到目标血压(第1组和第2组SBP每周降低分别为5.28和3.38 mmHg,DBP每周降低分别为2.51和1.73 mmHg)。这使得可以减轻医生的负担并节省时间预算(p>0.032)。

结论

第1组的治疗策略在血压正常化速度和所需就诊次数方面优于第2组,并显示出显著的经济效益。

相似文献

1
[Clinicoeconomic effectiveness of using psychotherapy to treat patients with essential hypertension].[使用心理治疗方法治疗原发性高血压患者的临床经济效果]
Ter Arkh. 2015;87(1):64-68. doi: 10.17116/terarkh201587164-68.
2
Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial.基于家庭或医生办公室血压测量的降压治疗:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):955-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.955.
3
Effects of combination olmesartan medoxomil plus azelnidipine versus monotherapy with either agent on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: additional results from the REZALT study.奥美沙坦酯与阿折地平联合治疗与单药治疗对日本原发性高血压患者 24 小时动态血压和脉搏率的影响:REZALT 研究的附加结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):861-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.020.
4
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.根据基线收缩压评估比索洛尔单药治疗的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、剂量范围研究的汇总数据的回顾性分析,这些研究纳入了轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028.
6
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
7
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
8
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
9
Nebivolol monotherapy for patients with systolic stage II hypertension: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.比索洛尔单药治疗收缩期 II 期高血压患者:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Clin Ther. 2013 Feb;35(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
Efficacy and safety of two ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination formulations in adults with stage 1 or stage 2 arterial hypertension evaluated by using ABPM.使用 ABPM 评估两种雷米普利和氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方制剂在 1 期或 2 期动脉高血压成人中的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2013 May;35(5):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 25.