Gwynn Josephine, Lock Mark, Turner Nicole, Dennison Ray, Coleman Clare, Kelly Brian, Wiggers John
Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Newcastle, Moree, Australia.
Aust J Rural Health. 2015 Aug;23(4):235-42. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12182. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Gaps exist in researchers' understanding of the 'practice' of community governance in relation to research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
We examine Aboriginal community governance of two rural NSW research projects by applying principles-based criteria from two independent sources.
One research project possessed a strong Aboriginal community governance structure and evaluated a 2-year healthy lifestyle program for children; the other was a 5-year cohort study examining factors influencing the mental health and well-being of participants.
The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's 'Values and ethics: guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research' and 'Ten principles relevant to health research among Indigenous Australian populations' described by experts in the field.
Adopt community-based participatory research constructs. Develop clear governance structures and procedures at the beginning of the study and allow sufficient time for their establishment. Capacity-building must be a key component of the research. Ensure sufficient resources to enable community engagement, conduct of research governance procedures, capacity-building and results dissemination.
The implementation of governance structures and procedures ensures research addresses the priorities of the participating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, minimises risks and improves outcomes for the communities.
Principles-based Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community governance of research is very achievable. Next steps include developing a comprehensive evidence base for appropriate governance structures and procedures, and consolidating a suite of practical guides for structuring clear governance in health research.
在与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民开展研究相关的社区治理“实践”方面,研究人员的理解存在差距。
我们通过应用来自两个独立来源的基于原则的标准,审视了新南威尔士州两个农村研究项目的原住民社区治理情况。
一个研究项目拥有强大的原住民社区治理结构,评估了一项为期两年的儿童健康生活方式项目;另一个是一项为期五年的队列研究,考察影响参与者心理健康和幸福的因素。
澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会的《价值观与伦理:原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民研究中的伦理行为指南》以及该领域专家描述的《与澳大利亚原住民健康研究相关的十项原则》。
采用基于社区的参与性研究架构。在研究开始时制定明确的治理结构和程序,并留出足够时间来建立这些结构和程序。能力建设必须是研究的关键组成部分。确保有足够资源以实现社区参与、开展研究治理程序、进行能力建设和传播研究结果。
治理结构和程序的实施确保研究关注参与研究的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区的优先事项,将风险降至最低,并改善社区的研究成果。
基于原则的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区研究治理是完全可以实现的。下一步包括为适当的治理结构和程序建立全面的证据基础,以及整合一套在健康研究中构建清晰治理的实用指南。