School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia.
National Centre for Naturopathic Medicine, Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Lismore 2480, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316166.
Australia's social, structural, and political context, together with the continuing impact of colonisation, perpetuates health care and outcome disparities for First Nations Australians. A new approach led by First Nations Australians is required to address these disparities. Co-design is emerging as a valued method for First Nations Australian communities to drive change in health policy and practice to better meet their needs and priorities. However, it is critical that co-design processes and outcomes are culturally safe and effective. : This project aimed to identify the current evidence around optimal approaches to co-design in health with First Nations Australians.
First Nations Australian co-led team conducted a comprehensive review to identify peer-reviewed and grey literature reporting the application of co-design in health-related areas by and with First Nations Australians. A First Nations Co-Design Working Group (FNCDWG) was established to guide this work and team.A Collaborative Yarning Methodology (CYM) was used to conduct a thematic analysis of the included literature.
After full-text screening, 99 studies were included. Thematic analysis elicited the following six key themes, which included 28 practical sub-themes, relevant to co-design in health with First Nations Australians: ; and .
The findings of this review provide a valuable snapshot of the existing evidence to be used as a starting point to guide appropriate and effective applications of co-design in health with First Nations Australians.
澳大利亚的社会、结构和政治背景,加上殖民化的持续影响,使原住民澳大利亚人的医疗保健和结果差距持续存在。需要由原住民澳大利亚人引领的新方法来解决这些差距。共同设计正在成为原住民澳大利亚社区推动卫生政策和实践变革的一种有价值的方法,以更好地满足他们的需求和优先事项。然而,至关重要的是,共同设计过程和结果在文化上是安全和有效的。:本项目旨在确定目前有关与原住民澳大利亚人共同设计健康相关方法的最佳证据。
由原住民澳大利亚人共同领导的团队进行了全面审查,以确定同行评审和灰色文献报告了共同设计在与原住民澳大利亚人相关的健康领域的应用。成立了一个原住民共同设计工作组(FNCDWG)来指导这项工作和团队。采用协作讨论方法(CYM)对纳入的文献进行主题分析。
经过全文筛选,共纳入 99 项研究。主题分析得出了以下六个关键主题,其中包括 28 个与原住民澳大利亚人共同设计健康相关的实用子主题:;和。
本综述的研究结果提供了现有证据的宝贵快照,可作为指导与原住民澳大利亚人共同设计健康的适当和有效应用的起点。