Suppr超能文献

连续呼气峰流速(PEF)测量能否区分职业性哮喘和过敏性肺泡炎?

Can serial PEF measurements separate occupational asthma from allergic alveolitis?

作者信息

Burge P S, Moore V C, Burge C B S G, Vellore A D, Robertson A S, Robertson W

机构信息

Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK,

Occupational Lung Disease Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK.

出版信息

Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;65(3):251-5. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occupational asthma commonly results in work-related changes in serial peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements. Whether alveolitis can result in similar changes is unknown.

AIMS

To identify differences and similarities of serial PEF between workers with occupational alveolitis and asthma seen during an outbreak investigation in a factory with metal-working fluid exposure.

METHODS

Workers with respiratory symptoms and rest-day improvement were identified by questionnaire. Each was asked to measure PEF 8 times daily for 4 weeks at home and work. Alveolitis was subsequently diagnosed from a validated scoring system including radiological changes, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy results. Occupational asthma was confirmed with a positive Oasys score >2.5 and a mean rest-work PEF >16 l/min from serial 2-hourly PEF measurements. The Oasys PEF plotter calculated differences between rest and workdays for mean PEF, diurnal variation and the scores were used to confirm an occupational effect (Oasys, area between curve and time point). Records were compared between the alveolitis group and the group with occupational asthma without alveolitis.

RESULTS

Forty workers with occupational asthma and 16 with alveolitis had indistinguishable PEF changes on workdays in terms of magnitude (median reduction 18.5 and 16.1 l/min, respectively) and diurnal variation. Immediate reactions were more common with occupational asthma and late reactions more common with alveolitis.

CONCLUSIONS

PEF responses to metal-working fluid aerosols do not distinguish occupational asthma from alveolitis except in timing. They can be used to identify the workplace as the cause of asthma and also alveolitis.

摘要

背景

职业性哮喘通常会导致连续呼气峰值流速(PEF)测量值出现与工作相关的变化。肺泡炎是否会导致类似变化尚不清楚。

目的

在一家暴露于金属加工液的工厂爆发调查期间,确定职业性肺泡炎和哮喘工人之间连续PEF的差异和相似之处。

方法

通过问卷调查识别出有呼吸道症状且休息日症状改善的工人。要求每人在家和工作时每天测量8次PEF,持续4周。随后根据包括放射学变化、一氧化碳弥散能力、支气管肺泡灌洗和活检结果在内的经过验证的评分系统诊断肺泡炎。职业性哮喘通过Oasys评分>2.5且每2小时连续测量的平均休息日-工作日PEF>16升/分钟得到确诊。Oasys PEF绘图仪计算休息日和工作日之间平均PEF、日变化的差异,这些分数用于确认职业影响(Oasys,曲线与时间点之间的面积)。比较肺泡炎组和无肺泡炎的职业性哮喘组的记录。

结果

40名职业性哮喘工人和16名肺泡炎工人在工作日的PEF变化在幅度(中位数分别降低18.5和16.1升/分钟)和日变化方面难以区分。即刻反应在职业性哮喘中更常见,迟发反应在肺泡炎中更常见。

结论

PEF对金属加工液气溶胶的反应除了在时间上外,无法区分职业性哮喘和肺泡炎。它们可用于确定工作场所是哮喘和肺泡炎的病因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验