• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试慢性无家可归的替代定义。

Testing Alternative Definitions of Chronic Homelessness.

作者信息

Byrne Thomas, Culhane Dennis P

机构信息

Dr. Byrne is with the School of Social Work, Boston University, Boston (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Sep;66(9):996-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400240. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201400240
PMID:25828880
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the potential impact of a proposed change to the official federal definition of chronic homelessness.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the emergency shelters in a large U.S. city, this study estimated the number of persons identified as chronically homeless under the current definition of chronic homelessness, a proposed new federal definition, and two alternative definitions and examined shelter utilization for each group.

RESULTS

Fewer than half as many people were considered chronically homeless under the proposed new federal definition compared with the current definition. Persons considered chronically homeless by the proposed new definition and, to a lesser extent, by the two alternative definitions, made heavier use of shelter compared with persons who met the current definition.

CONCLUSIONS

A proposed new and two alternative definitions of chronic homelessness are better suited than the existing federal definition for identifying persons with the most protracted experiences of homelessness.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了联邦官方对长期无家可归的定义提议变更可能产生的影响。

方法

本研究利用美国一个大城市紧急避难所的行政数据,估计了按照当前长期无家可归定义、一项提议的新联邦定义以及另外两项替代定义被认定为长期无家可归的人数,并考察了每组人员的避难所使用情况。

结果

与当前定义相比,按照提议的新联邦定义被视为长期无家可归的人数不到前者的一半。按照提议的新定义以及在较小程度上按照另外两项替代定义被视为长期无家可归的人,与符合当前定义的人相比,更多地使用了避难所。

结论

与现有的联邦定义相比,提议的一项新的和两项替代的长期无家可归定义更适合用于识别那些有最长时间无家可归经历的人。

相似文献

1
Testing Alternative Definitions of Chronic Homelessness.测试慢性无家可归的替代定义。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Sep;66(9):996-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400240. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
2
Perceived reasons for loss of housing and continued homelessness among homeless persons with mental illness.患有精神疾病的无家可归者失去住房并持续无家可归的感知原因。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Feb;56(2):172-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.2.172.
3
Why Do Homeless Families Exit and Return the Homeless Shelter? Factors Affecting the Risk of Family Homelessness in Salt Lake County (Utah, United States) as a Case Study.为什么无家可归的家庭会离开和返回无家可归者收容所?以盐湖县(美国犹他州)为例,影响家庭无家可归风险的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;16(22):4328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224328.
4
Down and out in New York and London: a cross-national comparison of homelessness.在纽约和伦敦穷困潦倒:无家可归者的跨国比较
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;45(8):769-76. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.8.769.
5
Creating a science of homelessness during the Reagan era.在里根时代创建一门关于无家可归问题的科学。
Milbank Q. 2015 Mar;93(1):139-78. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12108.
6
Homeless Shelter Entry in the Year After an Emergency Department Visit: Results From a Linked Data Analysis.急诊就诊后进入收容所:一项关联数据分析的结果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;76(4):462-467. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
All-cause, drug-related, and HIV-related mortality risk by trajectories of jail incarceration and homelessness among adults in New York City.纽约市成年人中,按监狱监禁和无家可归轨迹划分的全因、药物相关及艾滋病毒相关死亡风险。
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):261-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu313. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Identification of homelessness using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada following a national coding mandate: a validation study.加拿大安大略省在国家编码指令后使用健康管理数据识别无家可归者:一项验证研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;172:111430. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111430. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
Is homelessness hazardous to your health? Obstacles to the demonstration of a causal relationship.无家可归对你的健康有害吗?证明因果关系的障碍。
Can J Public Health. 2002 Nov-Dec;93(6):407-10. doi: 10.1007/BF03405026.
10
Identifying Homelessness among Veterans Using VA Administrative Data: Opportunities to Expand Detection Criteria.利用退伍军人事务部管理数据识别退伍军人中的无家可归者:扩大检测标准的机会。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 14;10(7):e0132664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132664. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
A recipe for systems change: Predictive modeling and street-level bureaucracy among homeless services.系统变革的秘诀:无家可归者服务中的预测性建模与街头官僚作风
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0328822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328822. eCollection 2025.
2
Met and unmet needs of homeless individuals at different stages of housing reintegration: A mixed-method investigation.处于不同住房再融入阶段的无家可归者的未满足需求:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245088. eCollection 2021.
3
Determinants of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt among former and currently homeless individuals.
曾无家可归和目前无家可归者自杀意念和自杀企图的决定因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 May;56(5):747-757. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01952-3. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Change in Housing Status among Homeless and Formerly Homeless Individuals in Quebec, Canada: A Profile Study.魁北克省无家可归者和以前的无家可归者的住房状况变化:概况研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;17(17):6254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176254.
5
Typology of Currently or Formerly Homeless Individuals Based on Their Use of Health and Social Services.基于健康和社会服务使用情况的当前或曾经无家可归者的类型学。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Jul;57(5):948-959. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00693-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Predictors of Emergency Department Use among Individuals with Current or Previous Experience of Homelessness.有当前或以往无家可归经历的个体急诊使用的预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;16(24):4965. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244965.
7
Somewhere to be permanent for a minute: Time and space perceptions of older adult men experiencing chronic homelessness in Detroit.能有个地方暂时安顿一会儿:底特律长期无家可归的老年男性对时间和空间的感知
J Hum Behav Soc Environ. 2017;27(6):515-529. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2017.1292983. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
Identifying Homeless Medicaid Enrollees Using Enrollment Addresses.利用参保地址识别无家可归的医疗补助参保者。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1992-2004. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12738. Epub 2017 Jul 3.