Suppr超能文献

消费者对医疗保健和研究领域电子数据共享的看法比较。

Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.

作者信息

Kim Katherine K, Joseph Jill G, Ohno-Machado Lucila

机构信息

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

New models of healthcare delivery such as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes seek to improve quality, access, and cost. They rely on a robust, secure technology infrastructure provided by health information exchanges (HIEs) and distributed research networks and the willingness of patients to share their data. There are few large, in-depth studies of US consumers' views on privacy, security, and consent in electronic data sharing for healthcare and research together.

OBJECTIVE

This paper addresses this gap, reporting on a survey which asks about California consumers' views of data sharing for healthcare and research together.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey conducted was a representative, random-digit dial telephone survey of 800 Californians, performed in Spanish and English.

RESULTS

There is a great deal of concern that HIEs will worsen privacy (40.3%) and security (42.5%). Consumers are in favor of electronic data sharing but elements of transparency are important: individual control, who has access, and the purpose for use of data. Respondents were more likely to agree to share deidentified information for research than to share identified information for healthcare (76.2% vs 57.3%, p < .001).

DISCUSSION

While consumers show willingness to share health information electronically, they value individual control and privacy. Responsiveness to these needs, rather than mere reliance on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), may improve support of data networks.

CONCLUSION

Responsiveness to the public's concerns regarding their health information is a pre-requisite for patient-centeredness. This is one of the first in-depth studies of attitudes about electronic data sharing that compares attitudes of the same individual towards healthcare and research.

摘要

未标注

诸如责任医疗组织和以患者为中心的医疗之家等新型医疗服务模式旨在提高质量、可及性和成本。它们依赖于由健康信息交换机构(HIEs)和分布式研究网络提供的强大、安全的技术基础设施,以及患者共享其数据的意愿。关于美国消费者对医疗保健和研究中电子数据共享的隐私、安全及同意方面的观点,很少有大型、深入的研究。

目的

本文弥补了这一空白,报告了一项关于加利福尼亚州消费者对医疗保健和研究中数据共享观点的调查。

材料与方法

所进行的调查是对800名加利福尼亚人进行的具有代表性的随机数字拨号电话调查,以西班牙语和英语进行。

结果

人们非常担心健康信息交换机构会使隐私(40.3%)和安全(42.5%)状况恶化。消费者赞成电子数据共享,但透明度的要素很重要:个人控制、谁可以访问以及数据的使用目的。与为医疗保健共享已识别信息相比,受访者更有可能同意为研究共享去识别信息(76.2%对57.3%,p <.001)。

讨论

虽然消费者表示愿意以电子方式共享健康信息,但他们重视个人控制和隐私。满足这些需求,而不仅仅是依赖《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA),可能会改善对数据网络的支持。

结论

回应公众对其健康信息的担忧是以患者为中心的前提条件。这是首批比较同一个人对医疗保健和研究态度的关于电子数据共享态度的深入研究之一。

相似文献

1
Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
4
Patients' Perceptions of Different Information Exchange Mechanisms: An Exploratory Study in the United States.
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Aug;59(4-05):162-178. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721784. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing.
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641218. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Consumer Views on Privacy Protections and Sharing of Personal Digital Health Information.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1305.
8
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

3
Patterns of willingness to share health data with key stakeholders in US consumers: a latent class analysis.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):702-711. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf014.
4
Data professionals' attitudes on data privacy, sharing, and consent in healthcare and research.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 22;10:20552076241290964. doi: 10.1177/20552076241290964. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Iraqi Population Trusts in Electronic Healthcare Records: A Cross-sectional Study.
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241249448. doi: 10.1177/00469580241249448.
7
Health data sharing attitudes towards primary and secondary use of data: a systematic review.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 18;71:102551. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102551. eCollection 2024 May.
9
An experiment on data sharing options designs for eHealth interventions.
Internet Interv. 2023 Jul 1;33:100642. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100642. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

2
PCORnet: turning a dream into reality.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):576-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002864. Epub 2014 May 12.
3
Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):583-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002758. Epub 2014 May 12.
4
pSCANNER: patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):621-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002751. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
5
Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e320-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002579. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):730-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002370. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):714-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002308. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
9
Health data use, stewardship, and governance: ongoing gaps and challenges: a report from AMIA's 2012 Health Policy Meeting.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):204-11. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002117. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research?
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 24;369(17):1579-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1310102. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验