• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.消费者对医疗保健和研究领域电子数据共享的看法比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.影响加州消费者共享电子健康数据意愿的因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
3
Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand.为提供医疗服务而获取个人健康信息的同意与广泛获取:一项在新西兰使用 vignettes 对消费者态度进行的大规模电话调查。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 23;6(8):e011640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011640.
4
Patients' Perceptions of Different Information Exchange Mechanisms: An Exploratory Study in the United States.患者对不同信息交流机制的看法:美国的一项探索性研究。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Aug;59(4-05):162-178. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721784. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing.2017年消费者健康信息学与教育研究结果:健康数据的获取与共享
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641218. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Consumer Views on Privacy Protections and Sharing of Personal Digital Health Information.消费者对隐私保护和个人数字健康信息共享的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231305. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1305.
7
Doctors Routinely Share Health Data Electronically Under HIPAA, and Sharing With Patients and Patients' Third-Party Health Apps is Consistent: Interoperability and Privacy Analysis.根据 HIPAA 规定,医生通常会以电子方式共享健康数据,与患者及其患者第三方健康应用程序共享数据也是符合规定的:互操作性和隐私分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 2;22(9):e19818. doi: 10.2196/19818.
8
Distributed clinical data sharing via dynamic access-control policy transformation.通过动态访问控制策略转换实现分布式临床数据共享。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
10
Public attitudes toward health information exchange: perceived benefits and concerns.公众对健康信息交换的态度:感知到的益处和担忧。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP111-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary Care in a Public University Family Medicine Group in Québec (Canada): Data on Patients' Follow-Up and Cardiometabolic Risk Management.加拿大魁北克一所公立大学家庭医学组的多学科护理:患者随访及心脏代谢风险管理数据
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;13(14):1704. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141704.
2
Health care professionals intention to use digital health data hub working in East Gojjam Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Technology acceptance modeling.埃塞俄比亚西北部戈贾姆东部医院的医疗保健专业人员使用数字健康数据中心的意向:技术接受模型
PLoS One. 2025 May 15;20(5):e0322460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322460. eCollection 2025.
3
Patterns of willingness to share health data with key stakeholders in US consumers: a latent class analysis.美国消费者与关键利益相关者共享健康数据的意愿模式:一项潜在类别分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):702-711. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf014.
4
Data professionals' attitudes on data privacy, sharing, and consent in healthcare and research.数据专业人员对医疗保健和研究中数据隐私、共享及同意的态度。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 22;10:20552076241290964. doi: 10.1177/20552076241290964. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Iraqi Population Trusts in Electronic Healthcare Records: A Cross-sectional Study.伊拉克民众信任电子医疗记录:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241249448. doi: 10.1177/00469580241249448.
6
Preferences on Governance Models for Mental Health Data: Qualitative Study With Young People.青少年对心理健康数据治理模式的偏好:一项定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 23;8:e50368. doi: 10.2196/50368.
7
Health data sharing attitudes towards primary and secondary use of data: a systematic review.对健康数据初次使用和二次使用的共享态度:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Mar 18;71:102551. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102551. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Patient and Public Willingness to Share Personal Health Data for Third-Party or Secondary Uses: Systematic Review.患者和公众对个人健康数据用于第三方或二次使用的意愿:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e50421. doi: 10.2196/50421.
9
An experiment on data sharing options designs for eHealth interventions.一项关于电子健康干预措施数据共享选项设计的实验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Jul 1;33:100642. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100642. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study.激励措施在基于区块链的敏感健康数据共享平台使用中的作用:实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 18;25:e41805. doi: 10.2196/41805.

本文引用的文献

1
Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010-2011.无线替代:2010 - 2011年国家健康访谈调查的州级估计数据
Natl Health Stat Report. 2012 Oct 12(61):1-15.
2
PCORnet: turning a dream into reality.PCORnet:将梦想变为现实。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):576-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002864. Epub 2014 May 12.
3
Patient-powered research networks: building capacity for conducting patient-centered clinical outcomes research.患者主导的研究网络:为开展以患者为中心的临床结局研究构建能力。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):583-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002758. Epub 2014 May 12.
4
pSCANNER: patient-centered Scalable National Network for Effectiveness Research.pSCANNER:以患者为中心的可扩展全国有效性研究网络。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):621-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002751. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
5
Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy.个体化癌症治疗中关于基因组信息隐私的态度。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e320-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002579. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
6
Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature.美国分布式研究网络的临床研究数据仓库治理:文献系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):730-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002370. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups.分布式研究网络中的患者知情治理:六个患者焦点小组的结果与讨论
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:920-9. eCollection 2013.
8
Data governance requirements for distributed clinical research networks: triangulating perspectives of diverse stakeholders.分布式临床研究网络的数据治理要求:多方利益相关者观点的三角测量。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):714-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002308. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
9
Health data use, stewardship, and governance: ongoing gaps and challenges: a report from AMIA's 2012 Health Policy Meeting.健康数据的使用、管理和治理:持续存在的差距和挑战:来自 AMIA 2012 年健康政策会议的报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):204-11. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002117. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research?随机注册试验——临床研究中的下一项颠覆性技术?
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 24;369(17):1579-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1310102. Epub 2013 Aug 31.

消费者对医疗保健和研究领域电子数据共享的看法比较。

Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.

作者信息

Kim Katherine K, Joseph Jill G, Ohno-Machado Lucila

机构信息

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA

Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocv014
PMID:25829461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5009901/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

New models of healthcare delivery such as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes seek to improve quality, access, and cost. They rely on a robust, secure technology infrastructure provided by health information exchanges (HIEs) and distributed research networks and the willingness of patients to share their data. There are few large, in-depth studies of US consumers' views on privacy, security, and consent in electronic data sharing for healthcare and research together.

OBJECTIVE

This paper addresses this gap, reporting on a survey which asks about California consumers' views of data sharing for healthcare and research together.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey conducted was a representative, random-digit dial telephone survey of 800 Californians, performed in Spanish and English.

RESULTS

There is a great deal of concern that HIEs will worsen privacy (40.3%) and security (42.5%). Consumers are in favor of electronic data sharing but elements of transparency are important: individual control, who has access, and the purpose for use of data. Respondents were more likely to agree to share deidentified information for research than to share identified information for healthcare (76.2% vs 57.3%, p < .001).

DISCUSSION

While consumers show willingness to share health information electronically, they value individual control and privacy. Responsiveness to these needs, rather than mere reliance on Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), may improve support of data networks.

CONCLUSION

Responsiveness to the public's concerns regarding their health information is a pre-requisite for patient-centeredness. This is one of the first in-depth studies of attitudes about electronic data sharing that compares attitudes of the same individual towards healthcare and research.

摘要

未标注

诸如责任医疗组织和以患者为中心的医疗之家等新型医疗服务模式旨在提高质量、可及性和成本。它们依赖于由健康信息交换机构(HIEs)和分布式研究网络提供的强大、安全的技术基础设施,以及患者共享其数据的意愿。关于美国消费者对医疗保健和研究中电子数据共享的隐私、安全及同意方面的观点,很少有大型、深入的研究。

目的

本文弥补了这一空白,报告了一项关于加利福尼亚州消费者对医疗保健和研究中数据共享观点的调查。

材料与方法

所进行的调查是对800名加利福尼亚人进行的具有代表性的随机数字拨号电话调查,以西班牙语和英语进行。

结果

人们非常担心健康信息交换机构会使隐私(40.3%)和安全(42.5%)状况恶化。消费者赞成电子数据共享,但透明度的要素很重要:个人控制、谁可以访问以及数据的使用目的。与为医疗保健共享已识别信息相比,受访者更有可能同意为研究共享去识别信息(76.2%对57.3%,p <.001)。

讨论

虽然消费者表示愿意以电子方式共享健康信息,但他们重视个人控制和隐私。满足这些需求,而不仅仅是依赖《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA),可能会改善对数据网络的支持。

结论

回应公众对其健康信息的担忧是以患者为中心的前提条件。这是首批比较同一个人对医疗保健和研究态度的关于电子数据共享态度的深入研究之一。