Fried Jana, Harris Bronwyn, Eyles John, Moshabela Mosa
Coventry University, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Qual Health Res. 2015 May;25(5):622-35. doi: 10.1177/1049732315575315.
Achieving equitable access to health care is an important policy goal, with access influenced by affordability, availability, and acceptability of specific services. We explore patient narratives from a 5-year program of research on health care access to examine relationships between social constructions of illness and the acceptability of health services in the context of tuberculosis treatment and antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. Acceptability of services seems particularly important to the meanings patients attach to illness and care, whereas-conversely-these constructions appear to influence what constitutes acceptability and hence affect access to care. We highlight the underestimated role of individually, socially, and politically constructed healthworlds; traditional and biomedical beliefs; and social support networks. Suggested policy implications for improving acceptability and hence overall health care access include abandoning patronizing approaches to care and refocusing from treating "disease" to responding to "illness" by acknowledging and incorporating patients' healthworlds in patient-provider interactions.
实现公平的医疗保健可及性是一项重要的政策目标,可及性受到特定服务的可负担性、可获得性和可接受性的影响。我们通过一项为期5年的医疗保健可及性研究项目中的患者叙述,来探讨在南非结核病治疗和抗逆转录病毒疗法背景下,疾病的社会建构与医疗服务可接受性之间的关系。服务的可接受性对于患者赋予疾病和护理的意义似乎尤为重要,而相反,这些建构似乎会影响可接受性的构成要素,进而影响医疗服务的可及性。我们强调了个体、社会和政治建构的健康世界、传统和生物医学信念以及社会支持网络被低估的作用。为提高可接受性从而改善整体医疗保健可及性而提出的政策建议包括摒弃居高临下的护理方式,从治疗“疾病”转向应对“病症”,即在医患互动中承认并纳入患者的健康世界。