Mynampati Praffulla, Babu Mandava Ramesh, Saraswathi Devabhaktuni Disha, Kumar Janga Ravi, Gudugunta Leneena, Gaddam Divya
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Chinoutapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mamata Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):140-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153072.
To compare the fracture resistance and modes of failures of three different aesthetic MOD onlays on endodontically treated premolars.
Forty sound maxillary premolars were selected of which 10 untreated teeth were taken as control (Group I). The other thirty premolars were subjected to standardized MOD onlay preparations and root canal treatments and divided into 3 equal groups. Onlays were prepared in Group II- Indirect composite, Group III- Lithium Disilicate ceramic and Group IV- Full Zirconia. All onlays were cemented using Multilink Automix. All the 40 samples were subjected to fracture resistance testing on Universal testing machine. Also fractured specimens were observed under stereo-microscope for modes of failure.
Group IV presented the highest fracture resistance. Groups II and III presented no significant difference in fracture resistance from each other (P > 0.05). Group II and Group III showed significantly lower fracture resistance values than Group I. Coming to modes of failure, only Group IV had showed no cracks in any of the restorations.
Full Zirconia MOD onlays increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars to a significantly higher level than the sound teeth.
比较三种不同美学型近中邻面远中面(MOD)高嵌体应用于根管治疗后的前磨牙时的抗折性及折裂模式。
选取40颗健康上颌前磨牙,其中10颗未经治疗的牙齿作为对照组(I组)。另外30颗前磨牙进行标准化的MOD高嵌体制备及根管治疗,并分为3个相等的组。II组制作间接复合树脂高嵌体,III组制作二硅酸锂陶瓷高嵌体,IV组制作全锆高嵌体。所有高嵌体均使用Multilink Automix粘结剂粘结。所有40个样本在万能试验机上进行抗折性测试。此外,在体视显微镜下观察折裂标本的折裂模式。
IV组呈现出最高的抗折性。II组和III组在抗折性方面彼此无显著差异(P>0.05)。II组和III组的抗折性值显著低于I组。关于折裂模式,只有IV组的任何修复体均未出现裂纹。
全锆MOD高嵌体使根管治疗后的前磨牙的抗折性提高到显著高于健康牙齿的水平。