Das Writuparna, Bhattacharya Susmita, Ghosh Sarmila, Saha Swarnamukul, Mallik Suchismita, Pal Saswati
Department of Anesthesiology, Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, N.R.S. Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):184-8. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.152881.
Laparoscopy though minimally invasive produces significant hemodynamic surge and neuroendocrine stress response. Though general anesthesia (GA) is the conventional technique, now-a-days, regional anesthesia has been accepted for laparoscopic diagnostic procedures, and its use is also being extended to laparoscopic surgeries.
The aim was to compare the hemodynamic surge and neuroendocrine stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under GA and spinal anesthesia (SA) in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) PS 1 patients.
Thirty ASA physical status I patients, aged 18-65 years were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 15 each. Group A received GA with controlled ventilation. Patients were preoxygenated for 5 min with 100/5 oxygen, premedicated with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenous (i.v), fentanyl 2 mcg/kg i.v; induction was done with thiopentone 3-5 mg/kg i.v; intubation was achieved after muscle relaxation with 0.5 mg/kg atracurium besylate i.v. Anesthesia was maintained with 1-2% sevoflurane and N2O:O2 (60:40) and intermittent i.v injection of atracurium besylate. Group B SA with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25 μg fentanyl along with local anesthetic instillation in the subdiaphragmatic space. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation, end tidal carbon-dioxide were recorded. Venous blood was collected for cortisol assay before induction and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum. All data were collected in Microsoft excel sheet and statistically analyzed using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All numerical data were analyzed using Student's t-test and paired t-test. Any value <0.05 was taken as significant.
Mean arterial pressure and mean HR and postpneumoperitoneum cortisol level were lower in group B than group A though the difference was not statistically significant in hemodynamic parameters but significant in case of cortisol.
Spinal anesthesia administered for LC maintained comparable hemodynamics compared to GA and did not produce any ventilatory depression. It also produced less neuroendocrine stress response as seen by reduction in the level of serum cortisol in ASA PS 1 patients put for LC.
腹腔镜检查虽为微创手术,但会引起显著的血流动力学波动和神经内分泌应激反应。尽管全身麻醉(GA)是传统技术,但如今区域麻醉已被用于腹腔镜诊断手术,其应用也正在扩展到腹腔镜手术。
旨在比较美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为1级的患者在全身麻醉(GA)和脊髓麻醉(SA)下进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)时的血流动力学波动和神经内分泌应激反应。
30例年龄在18 - 65岁的ASA身体状况分级为1级的患者被随机分为两组,每组15例。A组接受控制通气的全身麻醉。患者用100%/5%氧气预充氧5分钟,静脉注射咪达唑仑0.03mg/kg进行术前用药,静脉注射芬太尼2μg/kg;用硫喷妥钠3 - 5mg/kg静脉注射诱导;静脉注射0.5mg/kg苯磺顺阿曲库铵使肌肉松弛后插管。用1% - 2%七氟醚和N2O:O2(60:40)维持麻醉,并间断静脉注射苯磺顺阿曲库铵。B组采用0.5%高压布比卡因和25μg芬太尼进行脊髓麻醉,并在膈下间隙注入局部麻醉药。记录平均动脉压、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度、呼气末二氧化碳分压。在诱导前和气腹后30分钟采集静脉血进行皮质醇测定。所有数据收集在Microsoft excel工作表中,并使用SPSS软件16版(美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥市SPSS公司)进行统计分析。所有数值数据采用Student's t检验和配对t检验进行分析。任何值<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
B组的平均动脉压、平均心率和气腹后皮质醇水平低于A组,尽管血流动力学参数差异无统计学意义,但皮质醇水平差异有统计学意义。
与全身麻醉相比,脊髓麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术时维持了相当的血流动力学,且未产生任何通气抑制。在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的ASA身体状况分级为1级的患者中,脊髓麻醉还通过血清皮质醇水平的降低表现出较少的神经内分泌应激反应。