Yuksek Yunus Nadi, Akat Arif Zeki, Gozalan Ugur, Daglar Gul, Pala Yasar, Canturk Mehmet, Tutuncu Tanju, Kama Nuri Aydin
4th Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):533-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.05.043.
Advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) such as less pain and short hospital stay make it the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. There are limited data about LC under spinal anesthesia. This study was designed to evaluate LC under spinal anesthesia.
Twenty-nine patients underwent surgery for LC under spinal anesthesia at the 4th Department of Surgery of the Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital between April 2005 and January 2006. All patients were informed about spinal anesthesia in detail. The patients also were informed about the risk of conversion to general anesthesia, and all patients provided informed consent. The election criteria for spinal anesthesia were as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk group 1 or 2; risk score for conversion from LC to open cholecystectomy (RSCO) less than negative 3; and presence of gallstone disease. Standard laparoscopic technique was applied to all patients. Simple questionnaire forms were developed for both patients and surgeons to provide comments about the operation.
The operation was completed laparoscopically on 26 patients, while 3 patients needed general anesthesia due to severe right shoulder pain. None of the patients had cardiopulmonary problems other than transient hypotension during surgery. Intravenous fentanyl (25 microg) was needed in 13 patients due to severe right shoulder pain. Five patients still had severe shoulder pain after fentanyl injection. Local washing of the right diaphragm with 2% lidocaine solution was successful in the remaining 5 patients in whom fentanyl injection failed to stop the pain. All of the patients' answers to the questions regarding the comfort of operation were "very well" at the 1-month postoperative evaluation. All surgeons stated that there was no difference from LC under general anesthesia.
All of the patients and surgeons were satisfied with LC under spinal anesthesia. Therefore, LC under spinal anesthesia may be an appropriate treatment choice to increase the number of patients eligible for outpatient surgery.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)具有疼痛轻、住院时间短等优点,使其成为胆结石的首选治疗方法。关于蛛网膜下腔麻醉下LC的数据有限。本研究旨在评估蛛网膜下腔麻醉下的LC。
2005年4月至2006年1月期间,29例患者在安卡拉努穆内教育和研究医院外科四科接受了蛛网膜下腔麻醉下的LC手术。所有患者均详细了解了蛛网膜下腔麻醉情况。患者也被告知了转为全身麻醉的风险,所有患者均签署了知情同意书。蛛网膜下腔麻醉的选择标准如下:美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)风险组1或2;从LC转为开腹胆囊切除术的风险评分(RSCO)小于-3;以及存在胆结石疾病。所有患者均采用标准腹腔镜技术。为患者和外科医生设计了简单的问卷,以提供关于手术的意见。
26例患者腹腔镜手术完成,3例因严重右肩疼痛需要全身麻醉。手术期间,除短暂性低血压外,所有患者均无心肺问题。13例患者因严重右肩疼痛需要静脉注射芬太尼(25微克)。5例患者注射芬太尼后仍有严重肩痛。其余5例芬太尼注射未能止痛的患者,用2%利多卡因溶液局部冲洗右膈肌成功。术后1个月评估时,所有患者对手术舒适度问题的回答均为“非常好”。所有外科医生均表示,与全身麻醉下的LC无差异。
所有患者和外科医生对蛛网膜下腔麻醉下的LC均满意。因此,蛛网膜下腔麻醉下的LC可能是增加适合门诊手术患者数量的合适治疗选择。