Chu Stacy Y, Merkler Alexander E, Cheng Natalie T, Kamel Hooman
Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA ; Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Neurohospitalist. 2015 Apr;5(2):55-8. doi: 10.1177/1941874414548803.
Providers vary in their thresholds for obtaining blood cultures in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). We assessed the rate of missed diagnoses of infective endocarditis (IE) in patients discharged with stroke or TIA before blood culture results could have been available.
Using administrative claims data, we performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients discharged from nonfederal California emergency departments or acute care hospitals from 2005 through 2011 with stroke (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 433.x1, 434.x1, or 436 in any position) or TIA (ICD-9-CM code 435 in the primary diagnosis position). We excluded patients with a length of stay >2 days to focus on those discharged before conclusive blood culture results could have been available. Our outcome was hospitalization within 14 days with a new diagnosis of IE (ICD-9-CM codes 391.1 or 421.x in any position).
Among 173 966 eligible patients, 24 were subsequently hospitalized for IE-a readmission rate of 1.4 per 10 000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-1.9 per 10 000). Multiple logistic regression identified the following potential associations with readmission: prosthetic valve: odds ratio (OR), 15.8 (95% CI, 1.9-129.0); other valvular disease: OR, 1.5 (95% CI, 0.2-10.8); urinary tract infection: OR, 3.5 (95% CI, 1.0-12.3; P = .05).
In patients with acute cerebral ischemia discharged before blood culture results could have been available, the rate of subsequent IE was negligible. These findings argue against the liberal use of blood cultures for the routine evaluation of stroke or TIA.
在缺血性脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者中,医疗服务提供者获取血培养的阈值存在差异。我们评估了在血培养结果可得之前因脑卒中或TIA出院的患者中感染性心内膜炎(IE)漏诊率。
利用行政索赔数据,我们对2005年至2011年从加利福尼亚州非联邦急诊科或急性护理医院出院的所有脑卒中(国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本[ICD-9-CM]编码433.x1、434.x1或436在任何位置)或TIA(ICD-9-CM编码435在主要诊断位置)患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们排除了住院时间>2天的患者,以关注在血培养结果确定之前出院的患者。我们的结局是在14天内因新诊断的IE(ICD-9-CM编码391.1或421.x在任何位置)再次住院。
在173966名符合条件的患者中,有24名随后因IE再次住院——再入院率为每10000人中有1.4例(95%置信区间[CI],每10000人中有0.8 - 1.9例)。多因素logistic回归确定了以下与再入院的潜在关联:人工瓣膜:比值比(OR),15.8(95%CI,1.9 - 129.0);其他瓣膜疾病:OR,1.5(95%CI,0.2 - 10.8);尿路感染:OR,3.5(95%CI,1.0 - 12.3;P = 0.05)。
在血培养结果可得之前因急性脑缺血出院的患者中,随后发生IE的比率可忽略不计。这些发现反对在脑卒中或TIA的常规评估中过度使用血培养。