• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同骨密度部位种植体累积生存率及相关预后因素评估:一项对2684颗种植体的8年回顾性研究

Assessment of implant cumulative survival rates in sites with different bone density and related prognostic factors: an 8-year retrospective study of 2,684 implants.

作者信息

He Jing, Zhao Baohong, Deng Chunfu, Shang Dehao, Zhang Chong

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):360-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3580.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.3580
PMID:25830396
Abstract

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was set to explore the influence of local bone density (BD) on implant cumulative survival rates (ICSRs) and to assess prognostic factors associated with implant failure at sites with different BD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2005 and December 2011, 2,684 implants were placed in 1,377 patients and included in the study. Implants at sites with different BD were divided into four groups (G1 to G4) according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification, corresponding to bone types 1 to 4. ICSRs and the reasons for failure in each group were evaluated. Factors related to the local distribution of BD were also analyzed. A number of predictive variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate prognostic factors and their influence on implant failure rates.

RESULTS

In total, 45 implants were lost, resulting in ICSRs for G1 to G4 of 100%, 98.18%, 96.83%, and 92.25%, respectively. The main reasons for failure in each group were failed osseointegration and occlusal overloading. Low BD was associated with advanced age (> 50 years) and the posterior maxilla. Based on multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus and nonthreaded implants were significant factors in the high-BD group (G2), while advanced age, smoking, nonthreaded implants, and immediate loading were risk factors for the low-BD group (G3 and G4).

CONCLUSION

BD is one of the most important factors influencing the long-term ICSR, which decreases with decreasing BD values. Accurate risk evaluation for sites with different BD before implantation will be beneficial to implant survival.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在探讨局部骨密度(BD)对种植体累积生存率(ICSRs)的影响,并评估不同骨密度部位种植体失败的相关预后因素。

材料与方法

2005年1月至2011年12月期间,1377例患者共植入2684枚种植体并纳入本研究。根据Lekholm和Zarb分类,将不同骨密度部位的种植体分为四组(G1至G4),分别对应骨类型1至4。评估每组的种植体累积生存率及失败原因。同时分析与局部骨密度分布相关的因素。通过单因素和多因素分析检查了多个预测变量,以评估预后因素及其对种植体失败率的影响。

结果

总共45枚种植体丢失,G1至G4组的种植体累积生存率分别为100%、98.18%、96.83%和92.25%。每组失败的主要原因是骨结合失败和咬合过载。低骨密度与高龄(>50岁)和上颌后部有关。多因素分析显示,糖尿病和非螺纹种植体是高骨密度组(G2)的显著因素,而高龄、吸烟、非螺纹种植体和即刻负重是低骨密度组(G3和G4)的危险因素。

结论

骨密度是影响种植体长期累积生存率的最重要因素之一,种植体累积生存率随骨密度值降低而下降。植入前对不同骨密度部位进行准确的风险评估将有利于种植体的存活。

相似文献

1
Assessment of implant cumulative survival rates in sites with different bone density and related prognostic factors: an 8-year retrospective study of 2,684 implants.不同骨密度部位种植体累积生存率及相关预后因素评估:一项对2684颗种植体的8年回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):360-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3580.
2
Immediate versus conventional loading of post-extraction implants in the edentulous jaws.无牙颌拔牙后种植体的即刻负重与传统负重
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):926-35. doi: 10.1111/cid.12055. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
3
Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study.后牙区下颌骨和上颌骨中使用化学改性表面(SLActive)的士卓曼种植体即刻和早期负重:一项前瞻性多中心研究的1年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1119-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01626.x.
4
Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.即刻负载 NanoTite PREVAIL 种植体:一项前瞻性的为期 1 年的临床和放射学研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Mar;12(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00128.x.
5
Partial Rehabilitation with Distally Tilted and Straight Implants in the Posterior Maxilla with Immediate Loading Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up.采用即刻负重方案,使用远中倾斜和直立种植体对上颌后牙区进行部分修复:一项为期5年随访的回顾性队列研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):891-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4324.
6
Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants.锥形种植体的回顾性临床评估:上颌种植体延期和即刻植入的 10 年随访。
Implant Dent. 2012 Aug;21(4):350-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31825feb16.
7
Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure.对采用即刻负重固定临时修复方案用344颗单阶段种植体修复的56个无牙牙弓进行回顾性分析:种植体失败的统计学预测因素
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):823-30.
8
Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up.一项关于一体式种植体的前瞻性多中心研究的临床评估。第1部分:随访1年后的边缘骨水平评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):226-34.
9
A long-term retrospective analysis of survival rates of implants in the mandible.下颌骨种植体存活率的长期回顾性分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1348-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3910.
10
A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla.即刻负载种植体在拔牙窝与愈合后位点的对比回顾性研究:上颌 6-7 年后的结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):373-84.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Drilling Protocol on Primary Implant Stability Depending on Different Bone Qualities and Implant Macro-Designs, Lengths, and Diameters.根据不同骨质量以及种植体的宏观设计、长度和直径,钻孔方案对种植体初期稳定性的影响
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Aug 16;16(8):296. doi: 10.3390/jfb16080296.
2
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine: A Critical Review.人工智能在牙科医学中的应用:一项批判性综述。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):474-486. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.009. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Analysis of changes in bone mineral density and cortical bone thickness after reconstruction of the mandible with fibula, is condyle preservation a critical influence factor?
分析腓骨重建下颌骨后骨密度和皮质骨厚度的变化,髁突保存是关键影响因素吗?
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 1;28(11):622. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06027-0.
4
Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Modified Lekholm and Zarb Bone Quality Classification Based on Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An Observatsion Study.基于锥形束计算机断层扫描的改良Lekholm和Zarb骨质量分类的可重复性和再现性:一项观察性研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Jul 11;14(4):278-286. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_291_21. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug.
5
A study on the morphology of iliac crest based on the objectives of jaw bone defect reconstruction.基于颌骨缺损重建目标的髂嵴形态学研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 21;28(7):390. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05764-6.
6
Feasibility analysis of bone density evaluation with Hounsfield unit value after fibula flap reconstruction of jaw defect.腓骨瓣修复颌骨缺损后基于Hounsfield单位值的骨密度评估可行性分析
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Aug 30;45(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40902-023-00397-3.
7
Evaluation of hydrophilic surface osseointegration in low-density bone: Preclinical study in rabbits.评价低骨密度条件下亲水表面的骨整合:兔的临床前研究。
Braz Dent J. 2023 May-Jun;34(3):66-72. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305352.
8
Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non-bruxer patients: A retrospective case-control study.种植体周围边缘骨丧失:磨牙症和非磨牙症患者匹配组之间的比较:回顾性病例对照研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):124-132. doi: 10.1111/cid.13161. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
Quantifications of Mandibular Trabecular Bone Microstructure Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Age Estimation: A Preliminary Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对下颌骨小梁骨微结构进行量化以估计年龄:一项初步研究。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;11(10):1521. doi: 10.3390/biology11101521.
10
Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Overload: A Systematic Review Focusing on Occlusal Analysis through Digital and Analogic Methods.种植体周围骨吸收与负荷过重:一项通过数字和模拟方法聚焦咬合分析的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4812. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164812.