Woodall K L, Matthews K A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2593.
Health Psychol. 1989;8(4):403-26. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.8.4.403.
This study tested two major hypotheses regarding the characteristics of family environments associated with children's Type A behaviors, anger frequency and expression, hostile outlook, hostility displayed during an interview, and cardiovascular responses to laboratory stressors. Two measures of family environment, Positive Affiliation and Authoritarianism, were derived by a factor analysis of the Family Environment Scale completed by parents. The sample consisted of 66 girls and 48 boys enrolled in Grades 2 through 12 from 114 families residing in a predominantly White, upper-middle-class suburb of Pittsburgh. Analyses largely supported the first hypothesis--that a less supportive and positively involved family climate would be associated with attributes of potential coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in children. Families scoring low on Positive Affiliation had children who were assessed as more angry and hostile on the basis of questionnaires and interview. Boys from these families had a more pronounced heart rate response to all laboratory stressors. The second hypothesis--that authoritarianism, in the absence of positive involvement and supportiveness in the family, would be associated with attributes of potential CHD risk in children--received support in regard to boys' heart rate responses to the serial-subtraction and mirror-image-tracing tasks. High Authoritarianism scores in combination with low Positive Affiliation scores in families predicted a heightened heart rate response in boys. Sex differences in the pattern of associations among family and child characteristics were also found. Results suggest that factors in the family environment may be important influences in children's development of characteristics that may, in adulthood, place them at risk for CHD.
本研究检验了两个主要假设,这些假设涉及与儿童A型行为、愤怒频率与表达、敌对观念、访谈中表现出的敌意以及对实验室应激源的心血管反应相关的家庭环境特征。通过对父母填写的家庭环境量表进行因素分析,得出了家庭环境的两个测量指标:积极亲密度和专制程度。样本包括来自匹兹堡一个白人占主导、中上层阶级郊区的114个家庭中,66名女孩和48名男孩,他们就读于二年级至十二年级。分析在很大程度上支持了第一个假设——即支持性和积极参与度较低的家庭氛围会与儿童潜在冠心病(CHD)风险的特征相关。在积极亲密度方面得分较低的家庭中,其孩子在问卷调查和访谈中被评定为更易怒和更具敌意。来自这些家庭的男孩对所有实验室应激源的心率反应更为明显。第二个假设——即在家庭中缺乏积极参与和支持的情况下,专制程度会与儿童潜在CHD风险的特征相关——在男孩对连续减法和镜像追踪任务的心率反应方面得到了支持。家庭中高专制程度得分与低积极亲密度得分相结合,预示着男孩的心率反应会增强。在家庭与儿童特征之间的关联模式中也发现了性别差异。结果表明,家庭环境因素可能是影响儿童某些特征发展的重要因素,这些特征在成年后可能使他们面临患冠心病的风险。