Grivas E, Roudsari R V, Satterthwaite J D
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014 Sep;22(3):117-24.
The purpose of this study is to review the available literature related to composite inlays. Electronic databases published up to November 2013 were searched. Studies that evaluate composite resin inlays for the restoration of posterior teeth were selected. The studies should compare composite inlays against gold inlays, ceramic inlays and direct composite fillings regarding longevity, aesthetic quality and postoperative sensitivity or comparing the clinical effectiveness of them on premolars versus molars or on 1-2 surface preparations versus multi-surface preparations. Despite the heterogeneity of the available clinical trials composite inlays seem to be an effective method for the restoration of posterior teeth.
本研究的目的是回顾与复合嵌体相关的现有文献。检索了截至2013年11月发表的电子数据库。选择了评估复合树脂嵌体用于后牙修复的研究。这些研究应在使用寿命、美学质量和术后敏感性方面将复合嵌体与金嵌体、陶瓷嵌体和直接复合充填材料进行比较，或者比较它们在双尖牙与磨牙上或在1-2个牙面预备与多牙面预备上的临床效果。尽管现有临床试验存在异质性，但复合嵌体似乎是一种有效的后牙修复方法。
