• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正确的会阴切开术:真的存在吗?对以色列四家公立医院的横断面调查及文献综述

The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.

作者信息

Sagi-Dain Lena, Sagi Shlomi

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, 7 Michal St., Haifa, Israel,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2680-2. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-015-2680-2
PMID:25831995
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Our objective was to assess episiotomy technique used in Israeli hospitals, to determine factors influencing incision parameters, and to review relevant up-to-date professional literature.

METHODS

Using anonymous questionnaires, a survey was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in the four public hospitals in northern Israel over a 1-year period commencing in October 2013. In addition to demographic and professional data, the accoucheurs were asked to describe the technique they usually use to perform an episiotomy (length, angle, and distance of initiation point from midperineum).

RESULTS

Overall, 84 obstetricians and 32 midwives participated in the survey. Only 37.6% reported performing a mediolateral episiotomy, while the rest described the lateral type, placing the initiation point at an average distance of 2.45 ± 0.88 cm from the fourchette. Compared with midwives, obstetricians reported performing a significantly longer episiotomy (3.53 ± 1.01 vs. 2.73 ± 0.81 cm, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our study and relevant literature review, the technique of episiotomy varies significantly between health professionals and is not uniformly congruent with international practice guidelines. In part, this is derived from unclear literature evidence and lack of consensus definition for proper technique of this procedure by the national guidelines. Thus, further higher-quality research, uniform protocols, and educational programs are needed to guide episiotomy practice.

摘要

引言与假设

我们的目标是评估以色列医院所采用的会阴切开术技术,确定影响切口参数的因素,并查阅最新的相关专业文献。

方法

从2013年10月开始,在以色列北部的四家公立医院,使用匿名问卷对产科医生和助产士进行了为期1年的调查。除了人口统计学和专业数据外,还要求接生者描述他们通常用于进行会阴切开术的技术(长度、角度以及起始点与会阴中点的距离)。

结果

总体而言,84名产科医生和32名助产士参与了调查。只有37.6%的人报告进行了中侧切开术,其余的人描述为侧切术,起始点平均距离阴唇系带2.45±0.88厘米。与助产士相比,产科医生报告的会阴切开术明显更长(3.53±1.01厘米对2.73±0.81厘米,p = 0.0002)。

结论

根据我们的研究和相关文献综述,会阴切开术技术在卫生专业人员之间存在显著差异,并且与国际实践指南并不完全一致。部分原因在于文献证据不明确,以及国家指南对该手术正确技术缺乏共识定义。因此,需要进一步开展更高质量的研究、统一方案和教育项目来指导会阴切开术的实践。

相似文献

1
The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.正确的会阴切开术:真的存在吗?对以色列四家公立医院的横断面调查及文献综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2680-2. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Indications for episiotomy performance - a cross-sectional survey and review of the literature.会阴切开术实施的指征——一项横断面调查及文献综述
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(3):361-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1065233. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
3
Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle?会阴侧切术:受过培训的助产士和医生是否从不同角度看待它?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
4
Episiotomy: What angle do you cut to the midline?会阴切开术:你向中线的切割角度是多少?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives in Jordan.约旦产科医生和助产士在会阴切开术中的知识、态度和经验。
Women Birth. 2020 Mar;33(2):e176-e181. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
[National survey about the practice of episiotomy within French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF)].[法国国家妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)关于会阴切开术实施情况的全国性调查]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2019 Sep;47(9):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
7
Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit.我们的会阴切开术操作是否正确?一项在高危产科病房评估法国技术的研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep;47(7):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
8
Episiotomy: beliefs, practice and the impact of educational intervention.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Dec 1;123(2):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.04.006.
9
Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece.希腊产科医生的会阴切开术和会阴修复实践
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;106(1):27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
10
Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China.产科医生和助产士会阴切开术实践的知识、态度和经验:一项来自中国的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 12;11(4):e043596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043596.

引用本文的文献

1
Episiotomy: Are Indian Obstetricians Getting the Angle Right?会阴切开术:印度产科医生的操作角度正确吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Jun;74(3):214-218. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01871-8. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Health care workers' perceptions of episiotomy in the era of respectful maternity care: a qualitative study of an obstetric training program in Mexico.尊重产妇护理时代医护人员对会阴切开术的看法:墨西哥一项产科培训计划的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04022-x.
3
Is it time to abandon episiotomy use? A randomized controlled trial (EPITRIAL).

本文引用的文献

1
Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery.会阴切开术的三角特征与阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2491-x. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Evaluation of the angled Episcissors-60(®) episiotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveries.在自然阴道分娩中对60°角会阴侧切剪(Episcissors-60(®))的评估。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jul 31;7:253-6. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S66901. eCollection 2014.
3
Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
是否到了摒弃会阴侧切术的时候了?一项随机对照试验(EPITRIAL)。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2377-2385. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04332-2. Epub 2020 May 24.
4
A novel classification for evaluating episiotomy practices: application to the Burgundy perinatal network.一种评估会阴切开术实践的新分类方法:在勃艮第围产期网络中的应用。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 16;19(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2424-2.
5
Modern Theories of Pelvic Floor Support : A Topical Review of Modern Studies on Structural and Functional Pelvic Floor Support from Medical Imaging, Computational Modeling, and Electromyographic Perspectives.盆底支持的现代理论:从医学成像、计算建模和肌电图角度对盆底结构和功能支持的现代研究的专题综述
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 12;19(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0752-9.
6
No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis.非会阴切开术与选择性侧切/中侧切术(EPITRIAL):一项中期分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):415-423. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3480-7. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
7
The optimal angle of the mediolateral episiotomy at crowning of the head during labor.分娩时胎头着冠时会阴侧切的最佳角度。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Dec;28(12):1795-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3349-9. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
The correct episiotomy: Does it exist?正确的会阴切开术:它存在吗?
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):161-2. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2879-2. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
初产妇会阴侧切两种切口角度的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jul;40(7):1877-82. doi: 10.1111/jog.12432.
4
Effect of different episiotomy techniques on perineal pain and sexual activity 3 months after delivery.不同会阴切开术技术对产后3个月会阴疼痛及性功能的影响
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Dec;25(12):1629-37. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2401-2. Epub 2014 May 8.
5
Cutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device, the Episcissors-60.以正确角度进行会阴侧切术:新型器械Episcissors-60的评估
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Feb 21;7:23-8. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S60056. eCollection 2014.
6
Mediolateral episiotomy: are trained midwives and doctors approaching it from a different angle?会阴侧切术:受过培训的助产士和医生是否从不同角度看待它?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
7
The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.在荷兰低危人群中使用会阴切开术:二次分析。
Birth. 2013 Dec;40(4):247-55. doi: 10.1111/birt.12060.
8
Clinical evaluation of peripartum outcomes of mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy.会阴侧切术中外侧与中侧会阴切开术围产期结局的临床评估
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;124(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
9
Rates of interventions in labor and birth across Canada: findings of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey.加拿大各地分娩干预率:加拿大母婴体验调查结果。
Birth. 2012 Sep;39(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00549.x. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
Different episiotomy techniques, postpartum perineal pain, and blood loss: an observational study.不同的会阴切开术技术、产后会阴疼痛及失血情况:一项观察性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1960-3. Epub 2012 Oct 30.