• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

会阴切开术的三角特征与阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险

Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery.

作者信息

Gonzalez-Díaz E, Moreno Cea L, Fernández Corona A

机构信息

Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario of León (CAULE), C/ Altos de Nava S/N, 24080, León, Spain,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2491-x. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-014-2491-x
PMID:25227745
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the trigonometric properties of episiotomy in operative vaginal delivery (OVD) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

The study included 72 primiparous women who had an OVD and episiotomy. Cases (n = 36) had sustained OASIS at birth, while controls (n = 36) had not. The groups were matched for instrumental delivery. The episiotomy scar was identified and its trigonometric characteristics were measured at 8-12 weeks postpartum. Data were analysed using conditional logistic analysis.

RESULTS

The angle of episiotomy behaves as a factor associated with anal sphincter injury, so women with a mediolateral episiotomy and an angle greater than 20° have an 87% less risk of having an OASIS (odds ratio 0.13, 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.58). The study showed that scarred episiotomies at 8-12 weeks after OVD with an angle ≤ 20°, depth and distance between the episiotomy and anus ≤ 15 mm, total upper triangle perimeter ≤ 75 mm, para-anal triangle perimeter ≤ 15 mm and areas between scar and midline ≤ 250 mm(2) were significantly associated with higher risk of OASIS.

CONCLUSIONS

When a mediolateral episiotomy is performed in OVD the technique has a strong effect on the occurrence of OASIS. Additional research is needed to determine if the optimal technique for mediolateral episiotomies produces less OASIS than deferring the performance of episiotomy.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究旨在探讨手术阴道分娩(OVD)时会阴切开术的三角特性与产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)之间的关联。

方法

该研究纳入了72例接受OVD与会阴切开术的初产妇。病例组(n = 36)在分娩时发生了OASIS,而对照组(n = 36)未发生。两组在器械助产方面进行了匹配。在产后8 - 12周识别会阴切开术瘢痕并测量其三角特征。使用条件逻辑分析对数据进行分析。

结果

会阴切开术的角度是与肛门括约肌损伤相关的一个因素,因此采用会阴侧切且角度大于20°的女性发生OASIS的风险降低87%(优势比0.13,95%置信区间0.03 - 0.58)。研究表明,OVD后8 - 12周时,角度≤20°、会阴切开术与肛门之间的深度和距离≤15 mm、上三角总周长≤75 mm、肛门旁三角周长≤15 mm以及瘢痕与中线之间的面积≤250 mm²的会阴切开术瘢痕与发生OASIS的较高风险显著相关。

结论

在OVD中进行会阴侧切时,该技术对OASIS的发生有很大影响。需要进一步研究以确定会阴侧切的最佳技术是否比推迟会阴切开术产生更少的OASIS。

相似文献

1
Trigonometric characteristics of episiotomy and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in operative vaginal delivery.会阴切开术的三角特征与阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2491-x. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
2
Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.会阴切开术的特征和产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险:一项病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
4
Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries.在器械助产分娩中,会阴切开术和会阴的哪些特征与较低的产科肛门括约肌损伤风险相关?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.019. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
5
The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.会阴正中切开术对经阴道分娩时发生产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):404.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
6
[Perineal tears and episiotomy: Surgical procedure - CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines].[会阴撕裂与会阴切开术:手术操作 - CNGOF产科会阴预防与保护指南]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):948-967. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.024. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Is episiotomy worthwile to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women?对于未生育过的女性,在阴道助产术中行会阴切开术以预防产科肛门括约肌损伤是否值得?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jan;232:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Trends in obstetric anal sphincter injury in spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative vaginal delivery over a 10-year period: Lessons learned.10 年间阴道分娩与产科会阴切开术分娩中产科肛门括约肌损伤的变化趋势:经验教训。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):888-893. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14877. Epub 2023 May 26.
9
The association of episiotomy with obstetric anal sphincter injury--a population based matched cohort study.会阴切开术与产科肛门括约肌损伤的关联——一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 9;9(9):e107053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107053. eCollection 2014.
10
Impact of the EPISCISSORS-60 mediolateral episiotomy scissors on obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a 2-year data review in the United Kingdom.EPISCISSORS-60 会阴侧切剪刀对产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响:英国 2 年数据回顾。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Sep;31(9):1729-1734. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04201-7. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Midline and Mediolateral Episiotomy: Risk Assessment Based on Clinical Anatomy.会阴正中切开术和会阴中侧切开术:基于临床解剖学的风险评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;11(2):221. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020221.
2
Behavior of perineum during delivery before fetal head expulsion.胎儿头部娩出前分娩过程中会阴的表现。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):375-380. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3166-6. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Selective Episiotomy: Indications, Techinique, and Association with Severe Perineal Lacerations.选择性会阴切开术:适应证、技术及与严重会阴裂伤的关联

本文引用的文献

1
Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery.会阴体长度作为首次分娩时超声诊断肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 May;25(5):631-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2273-x. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
2
Morbidity experienced by women before and after operative vaginal delivery: prospective cohort study nested within a two-centre randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy.经阴道分娩前后女性的发病率:一项限制与常规会阴切开术使用的二中心随机对照试验中的嵌套前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2013 Jul;120(8):1020-6. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12184. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
3
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;38(6):301-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584942. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®).使用Braun-Stadler会阴侧切剪和EPISCISSORS-60(®)进行会阴侧切术的随机试验。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 Jun 1;8:251-4. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S83360. eCollection 2015.
5
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.产科肛门括约肌损伤:解剖学因素及可改变的第二产程干预措施综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Dec;26(12):1725-34. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2747-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.正确的会阴切开术:真的存在吗?对以色列四家公立医院的横断面调查及文献综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2680-2. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries-a retrospective register-based study in Finland.
真空辅助分娩与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:芬兰一项基于注册的回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03455.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
4
The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.会阴正中切开术对经阴道分娩时发生产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):404.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
5
Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.会阴切开术的特征和产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险:一项病例对照研究。
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):724-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Evaluation of the incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy at 60 degrees.评估 60 度会阴侧切术的切口角度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;112(3):220-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.09.015. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
7
A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands.荷兰产房会阴切开术和肛门括约肌损伤评估的前瞻性多中心审计。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Feb;108(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
8
A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.经阴道手术分娩时常规与限制性使用会阴切开术的随机对照试验:一项多中心试点研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01960.x.
9
The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair.分娩前及修复后侧会阴切开术的切口角度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;103(1):5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.026. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
10
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.