Suppr超能文献

视觉搜索效率对基于客体的注意的影响。

The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.

作者信息

Greenberg Adam S, Rosen Maya, Cutrone Elizabeth, Behrmann Marlene

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1544-57. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0892-7.

Abstract

The attentional prioritization hypothesis of object-based attention (Shomstein & Yantis in Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 41-51, 2002) suggests a two-stage selection process comprising an automatic spatial gradient and flexible strategic (prioritization) selection. The combined attentional priorities of these two stages of object-based selection determine the order in which participants will search the display for the presence of a target. The strategic process has often been likened to a prioritized visual search. By modifying the double-rectangle cueing paradigm (Egly, Driver, & Rafal in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177, 1994) and placing it in the context of a larger-scale visual search, we examined how the prioritization search is affected by search efficiency. By probing both targets located on the cued object and targets external to the cued object, we found that the attentional priority surrounding a selected object is strongly modulated by search mode. However, the ordering of the prioritization search is unaffected by search mode. The data also provide evidence that standard spatial visual search and object-based prioritization search may rely on distinct mechanisms. These results provide insight into the interactions between the mode of visual search and object-based selection, and help define the modulatory consequences of search efficiency for object-based attention.

摘要

基于客体的注意的注意优先级假说(Shomstein和Yantis,《知觉与心理物理学》,第64卷,第41 - 51页,2002年)提出了一个两阶段选择过程,包括自动空间梯度和灵活的策略性(优先级)选择。基于客体选择的这两个阶段的联合注意优先级决定了参与者在显示中搜索目标是否存在的顺序。策略性过程常被比作优先视觉搜索。通过修改双矩形提示范式(Egly、Driver和Rafal,《实验心理学杂志:总论》,第123卷,第161 - 177页,1994年)并将其置于更大规模视觉搜索的背景下,我们研究了优先级搜索如何受到搜索效率的影响。通过探测位于提示客体上的目标和提示客体外部的目标,我们发现围绕所选客体的注意优先级受到搜索模式的强烈调节。然而,优先级搜索的顺序不受搜索模式的影响。数据还提供了证据表明标准空间视觉搜索和基于客体的优先级搜索可能依赖于不同的机制。这些结果为视觉搜索模式与基于客体的选择之间的相互作用提供了见解,并有助于确定搜索效率对基于客体的注意的调节后果。

相似文献

1
The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.视觉搜索效率对基于客体的注意的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1544-57. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0892-7.
4
Perceptual load modulates object-based attention.知觉负载调节基于对象的注意力。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1661-9. doi: 10.1037/a0016893.
6
Object-based attention: sensory enhancement or scanning prioritization.基于客体的注意:感觉增强还是扫描优先级?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.004. Epub 2011 May 31.
10
Target frequency modulates object-based attention.目标频率调节基于对象的注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):981-989. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01746-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Object-based attention requires monocular visual pathways.基于对象的注意力需要单眼视觉通路。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1880-1890. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02467-7. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
2
Reconsidering Visual Search.重新审视视觉搜索
Iperception. 2015 Nov 8;6(6):2041669515614670. doi: 10.1177/2041669515614670. eCollection 2015 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Object-based attention: strategy versus automaticity.基于对象的注意力:策略与自动性。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;3(2):163-169. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1162. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
3
How prevalent is object-based attention?基于对象的注意有多普遍?
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030693. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
6
The spatial distribution of attention within and across objects.注意在对象内和对象间的空间分布。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):135-51. doi: 10.1037/a0024463. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
8
Object-based attention: shifting or uncertainty?基于客体的注意:转移还是不确定性?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Oct;72(7):1743-55. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1743.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验