Hein Elisabeth, Blaschke Stefan, Rolke Bettina
Evolutionary Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Plettenbergschule für Physiotherapie, Balingen, Germany.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):63-77. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1229-x.
Responses to targets that appear at a noncued position within the same object (invalid-same) compared to a noncued position at an equidistant different object (invalid-different) tend to be faster and more accurate. These cueing effects have been taken as evidence that visual attention can be object based (Egly, Driver, & Rafal, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177, 1994). Recent findings, however, have shown that the object-based cueing effect is influenced by object orientation, suggesting that the cueing effect might be due to a more general facilitation of attentional shifts across the horizontal meridian (Al-Janabi & Greenberg, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1-17, 2016; Pilz, Roggeveen, Creighton, Bennet, & Sekuler, PLOS ONE, 7, e30693, 2012). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the object-based cueing effect is influenced by object similarity and orientation. According to the object-based attention account, objects that are less similar to each other should elicit stronger object-based cueing effects independent of object orientation, whereas the horizontal meridian theory would not predict any effect of object similarity. We manipulated object similarity by using a color (Exp. 1, Exp. 2A) or shape change (Exp. 2B) to distinguish two rectangles in a variation of the classic two-rectangle paradigm (Egly et al., 1994). We found that the object-based cueing effects were influenced by the orientation of the rectangles and strengthened by object dissimilarity. We suggest that object-based cueing effects are strongly affected by the facilitation of attention along the horizontal meridian, but that they also have an object-based attentional component, which is revealed when the dissimilarity between the presented objects is accentuated.
与等距不同物体上的非线索化位置(无效-不同)相比,对出现在同一物体内非线索化位置(无效-相同)的目标的反应往往更快且更准确。这些线索化效应被视为视觉注意可以基于物体的证据(埃格利、德里弗和拉法尔,《实验心理学杂志:总论》,第123卷,第161 - 177页,1994年)。然而,最近的研究结果表明,基于物体的线索化效应受物体方向的影响,这表明线索化效应可能是由于水平子午线方向上注意力转移的更普遍促进作用(阿尔 - 贾纳比和格林伯格,《注意、感知与心理物理学》,第1 - 17页,2016年;皮尔兹、罗格维恩、克里顿、贝内特和塞库勒,《公共科学图书馆·综合》,第7卷,e30693,2012年)。本研究的目的是调查基于物体的线索化效应是否受物体相似性和方向的影响。根据基于物体的注意理论,彼此不太相似的物体应该会引发更强的基于物体的线索化效应,且与物体方向无关,而水平子午线理论则不会预测物体相似性有任何影响。我们通过颜色变化(实验1、实验2A)或形状变化(实验2B)来操纵物体相似性,以在经典的双矩形范式(埃格利等人,1994年)的变体中区分两个矩形。我们发现,基于物体的线索化效应受矩形方向的影响,并因物体差异而增强。我们认为,基于物体的线索化效应受水平子午线上注意力促进作用的强烈影响,但它们也有一个基于物体的注意成分,当所呈现物体之间的差异被突出时就会显现出来。