Lee Chang-Hyun, Kim Ki-Jeong, Hyun Seung-Jae, Yeom Jin S, Jahng Tae-Ahn, Kim Hyun-Jib
Department of Neurosurgery, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Jun;157(6):1063-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2388-6. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Subsidence is a frequent phenomenon in the interbody fusion process in patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There is little evidence of whether subsidence in the cervical spine has any impact on clinical outcomes.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of subsidence and clinical outcomes after ACDF and to consider reasons subsidence might not cause unfavorable clinical outcomes.
A total of 158 consecutive patients who underwent single-level ACDF were included. The patients were divided into a subsidence group (S-group) and a no subsidence group (N-group), with subsidence defined as a decrease by ≥3 mm in total intervertebral height (TIH). We analyzed outcomes resulting from subsidence, particularly focusing on clinical outcomes and subsequent global and segmental kyphosis using a repeated measure analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA).
Subsidence occurred in 74 patients (46.8%) as of a 12-month follow-up. The S-group included 58.6% with a stand-alone cage for interbody fusion (p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes improved significantly over time (neck pain, RM-ANOVA: F(1.3, 205) = 125.1, p < 0.001; arm pain, RM-ANOVA: F(1.3, 203) = 290.8, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in interaction with subsidence and clinical outcomes between the S- and N-group (neck pain, RM-ANOVA: F(2,153) = 1.04, p = 0.356, partial η(2) = 0.229; arm pain, RM-ANOVA: F(2,153) = 0.56, p = 0.571, partial η(2) = 0.142). Segmental angle increased in both groups over time and showed a statistically significant difference between the S- and N-groups (RM-ANOVA: F(3,143) = 6.148, p = 0.001, partial η(2) = 0.959). Although, global cervical angle decreased generally and displayed no statically significant difference between the S- and N-group (RM-ANOVA: F(3,119) = 2.361, p = 0.075, partial η(2) = 0.056).
Radiographic subsidence after ACDF occurred in 46.8% patients as of 12 months after the single-level ACDF. The lack of correlation between bad clinical outcome and radiographic subsidence may be due to segmental kyphosis, preserved posterior height, and maintaining the global cervical angle.
沉降是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)患者椎间融合过程中常见的现象。目前几乎没有证据表明颈椎沉降是否会对临床疗效产生影响。
本研究旨在探讨ACDF术后沉降与临床疗效之间的相关性,并分析沉降未导致不良临床疗效的原因。
共纳入158例连续接受单节段ACDF的患者。患者被分为沉降组(S组)和无沉降组(N组),沉降定义为椎间总高度(TIH)减少≥3mm。我们分析了沉降导致的结果,特别关注临床疗效以及随后的整体和节段性后凸畸形,采用重复测量方差分析(RM-ANOVA)。
截至12个月随访时,74例患者(46.8%)出现沉降。S组中58.6%采用独立椎间融合器(p = 0.002)。随着时间的推移,临床疗效显著改善(颈部疼痛,RM-ANOVA:F(1.3, 205) = 125.1,p < 0.001;手臂疼痛,RM-ANOVA:F(1.3, 203) = 290.8,p < 0.001)。S组和N组之间沉降与临床疗效的交互作用无显著差异(颈部疼痛,RM-ANOVA:F(2,153) = 1.04,p = 0.356,偏η(2) = 0.229;手臂疼痛,RM-ANOVA:F(2,153) = 0.56,p = 0.571,偏η(2) = 0.142)。两组的节段角度均随时间增加,且S组和N组之间存在统计学显著差异(RM-ANOVA:F(3,143) = 6.148,p = 0.001,偏η(2) = 0.959)。尽管整体颈椎角度总体下降,且S组和N组之间无统计学显著差异(RM-ANOVA:F(3,119) = 2.361,p = 0.075,偏η(2) = 0.056)。
单节段ACDF术后12个月时,46.8%的患者出现影像学沉降。不良临床疗效与影像学沉降之间缺乏相关性可能是由于节段性后凸畸形、后方高度保留以及整体颈椎角度维持。