Suppr超能文献

过度分散对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相邻节段病变和 cage 下沉的影响。

The impact of over-distraction on adjacent segment pathology and cage subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan, ROC.

Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, No.5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 28;13(1):18493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44998-4.

Abstract

Over-distraction has been shown to be a risk factor for cage subsidence and postoperative neck pain after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Biomechanical studies have demonstrated increased adjacent segment intradiscal pressure after ACDF. The purpose of this study is to determine if over-distraction of the index disc has an effect on adjacent segment pathology. A consecutive series of 145 patients who received primary ACDF for cervical degenerative pathologies from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into: (1) Over-distraction group (postoperative-preoperative index disc height ≥ 2 mm), and (2) No-distraction group (postoperative-preoperative index disc height < 2 mm). Outcome measures included radiographic parameters, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and incidences of cage subsidence, radiological and clinical adjacent segment pathologies (RASP and CASP) were compared between the two groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. The two groups were comparable with respect to age, follow-up length, JOA score, incidence of CASP, and radiographic parameters. The Over-distraction group (83 patients; 115 levels) had smaller preoperative index disc height (4.5 vs. 5.2 mm, p < 0.001), but taller postoperative index disc height (7.7 vs. 6.6 mm, p < 0.001) than No-distraction group (62 patients; 90 levels) Furthermore, significantly higher incidences of cage subsidence (47% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) and RASP (any progression: 48% vs. 15%, p < 0.001; progress ≥ 2 grades: 25% vs. 7%, p = 0.001) were observed in the Over-distraction group. The multivariate analysis indicated that over-distraction and multilevel fusion were independent risk factors for RASP. There were no clinical outcome differences between the Over-distraction group and the No-distraction group in ACDF. Over-distraction of the index level of ≥ 2 mm should be avoided because it significantly increases the incidences of RASP and cage subsidence.

摘要

过度牵开已被证明是颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后 cage 下沉和术后颈部疼痛的危险因素。生物力学研究表明,ACDF 后相邻节段椎间盘内压力增加。本研究旨在确定指数节段的过度牵开是否对相邻节段的病理有影响。回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间因颈椎退行性病变接受初次 ACDF 的 145 例连续患者的病例资料。将患者分为:(1)过度牵开组(术后-术前指数节段高度≥2mm),(2)无牵开组(术后-术前指数节段高度<2mm)。比较两组患者术前、术后和末次随访时的影像学参数、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分以及 cage 下沉、影像学和临床相邻节段病变(RASP 和 CASP)的发生率。两组患者在年龄、随访时间、JOA 评分、CASP 发生率和影像学参数方面无统计学差异。过度牵开组(83 例;115 个节段)术前指数节段高度较小(4.5mm 比 5.2mm,p<0.001),但术后指数节段高度较高(7.7mm 比 6.6mm,p<0.001)。此外,过度牵开组 cage 下沉(47%比 31%,p=0.04)和 RASP(任何进展:48%比 15%,p<0.001;进展≥2 级:25%比 7%,p=0.001)的发生率显著较高。多因素分析表明,过度牵开和多节段融合是 RASP 的独立危险因素。在 ACDF 中,过度牵开组与无牵开组的临床结果无差异。应避免指数节段的过度牵开≥2mm,因为这会显著增加 RASP 和 cage 下沉的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e4/10613266/cd126e7ddb41/41598_2023_44998_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验