Buchanan Adam H, Datta Santanu K, Skinner Celette Sugg, Hollowell Gail P, Beresford Henry F, Freeland Thomas, Rogers Benjamin, Boling John, Marcom P Kelly, Adams Martha B
Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, M.C. 26-20, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):961-70. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9836-6. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
Telegenetics-genetic counseling via live videoconferencing-can improve access to cancer genetic counseling (CGC) in underserved areas, but studies on cancer telegenetics have not applied randomized methodology or assessed cost. We report cost, patient satisfaction and CGC attendance from a randomized trial comparing telegenetics with in-person CGC among individuals referred to CGC in four rural oncology clinics. Participants (n = 162) were randomized to receive CGC at their local oncology clinic in-person or via telegenetics. Cost analyses included telegenetics system; mileage; and personnel costs for genetic counselor, IT specialist, and clinic personnel. CGC attendance was tracked via study database. Patient satisfaction was assessed 1 week post-CGC via telephone survey using validated scales. Total costs were $106 per telegenetics patient and $244 per in-person patient. Patient satisfaction did not differ by group on either satisfaction scale. In-person patients were significantly more likely to attend CGC than telegenetics patients (89 vs. 79 %, p = 0.03), with bivariate analyses showing an association between lesser computer comfort and lower attendance rate (Chi-square = 5.49, p = 0.02). Our randomized trial of telegenetics vs. in-person counseling found that telegenetics cost less than in-person counseling, with high satisfaction among those who attended. This study provides support for future randomized trials comparing multiple service delivery models on longer-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.
远程遗传学——通过实时视频会议进行遗传咨询——可以改善服务不足地区获得癌症遗传咨询(CGC)的机会,但关于癌症远程遗传学的研究尚未采用随机方法或评估成本。我们报告了一项随机试验的成本、患者满意度和CGC参与率,该试验比较了四家农村肿瘤诊所中被转诊至CGC的个体接受远程遗传学咨询与面对面CGC的情况。参与者(n = 162)被随机分配在当地肿瘤诊所接受面对面的CGC或通过远程遗传学接受咨询。成本分析包括远程遗传学系统、里程以及遗传咨询师、信息技术专家和诊所工作人员的人力成本。通过研究数据库跟踪CGC参与情况。在CGC结束1周后,通过电话调查使用经过验证的量表评估患者满意度。远程遗传学咨询患者的总成本为每人106美元,面对面咨询患者为每人244美元。在任何一个满意度量表上,两组患者的满意度均无差异。面对面咨询的患者比远程遗传学咨询的患者参加CGC的可能性显著更高(89%对79%,p = 0.03),双变量分析显示计算机操作舒适度较低与参与率较低之间存在关联(卡方 = 5.49,p = 0.02)。我们关于远程遗传学咨询与面对面咨询的随机试验发现,远程遗传学咨询的成本低于面对面咨询,参加者的满意度较高。本研究为未来比较多种服务提供模式对长期心理社会和行为结果影响的随机试验提供了支持。