Zierhut Heather A, MacFarlane Ian M, Ahmed Zahra, Davies Jill
Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Department of Psychology, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA, 17022, USA.
J Genet Couns. 2018 Apr;27(2):329-338. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0200-x. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
In 2009, the National Society of Genetic Counselors Service (NSGC) Delivery Model Task Force defined genetic counseling service delivery models including telephone (genetic counseling provided remotely by telephone) and telegenetics (counseling provided remotely using videoconferencing). Little is known about the experience of genetic counselors practicing telemedicine in the USA. We sought to evaluate perceived satisfaction, advantages, disadvantages, and barriers to the practice and implementation of telegenetics by practicing genetic counselors. A 21-question online survey was distributed via the NSGC's member directory. Descriptive statistics and a thematic analysis were used to analyze data. A total of 344 surveys were completed of which 235 (68.3%) respondents had delivered genetic counseling via telemedicine and 109 (36.6%) had not. Overall genetic counseling providers who had provided telegenetics were satisfied or very satisfied with their position (91%) and those who were not performing telegenetics were at least slightly interested in a telehealth position (92%).The most common appealing reasons for working in or wanting to work in telemedicine included an innovative approach to healthcare delivery, aspects of remote positions such as the ability to work from home, and flexibility of hours. Unappealing characteristics of telemedicine included the inability to see nonverbals, limited psychosocial counseling, and limited social interaction with colleague that is associated with remote positions. Barriers to implementation of telegenetics were noted by 53% of respondents with the largest barrier being billing and reimbursement. The results of this work suggest that telegenetics service organizations could consider increasing social interactions, attempting to use the preferred method of care (video) to increase ability to see nonverbals, offering flexible work hours, and allowing time to address psychosocial issues as they arise in consultations.
2009年,美国国家遗传咨询师协会服务(NSGC)交付模式特别工作组定义了遗传咨询服务交付模式,包括电话咨询(通过电话远程提供遗传咨询)和远程遗传学(使用视频会议远程提供咨询)。在美国,对于从事远程医疗的遗传咨询师的经历了解甚少。我们试图评估执业遗传咨询师对远程遗传学实践和实施的满意度、优点、缺点及障碍。通过NSGC的会员名录分发了一份包含21个问题的在线调查问卷。使用描述性统计和主题分析来分析数据。共完成了344份调查问卷,其中235名(68.3%)受访者通过远程医疗提供过遗传咨询,109名(36.6%)没有。总体而言,提供过远程遗传学服务的遗传咨询提供者对其工作满意度较高或非常满意(91%),而未从事远程遗传学服务的人员至少对远程医疗岗位略有兴趣(92%)。从事或希望从事远程医疗工作最常见的吸引人的原因包括一种创新的医疗服务提供方式、远程岗位的一些方面,如在家工作的能力以及工作时间的灵活性。远程医疗不吸引人的特点包括无法看到非语言信息、心理社会咨询有限以及与远程岗位相关的与同事的社交互动有限。53%的受访者指出了远程遗传学实施的障碍,最大的障碍是计费和报销。这项工作的结果表明,远程遗传学服务组织可以考虑增加社交互动,尝试使用首选的护理方式(视频)以增强观察非语言信息的能力,提供灵活的工作时间,并在咨询中出现心理社会问题时留出时间加以解决。