Cabana Graciela S, Lewis Cecil M, Tito Raúl Y, Covey R Alan, Cáceres Angela M, Cruz Augusto F De La, Durand Diana, Housman Genevieve, Hulsey Brannon I, Iannacone Gian Carlo, López Paul W, Martínez Rolando, Medina Ángel, Dávila Olimpio Ortega, Pinto Karla Paloma Osorio, Santillán Susan I Polo, Domínguez Percy Rojas, Rubel Meagan, Smith Heather F, Smith Silvia E, Massa Verónica Rubín de Celis, Lizárraga Beatriz, Stone Anne C
1 Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Hum Biol. 2014 Summer;86(3):147-65. doi: 10.13110/humanbiology.86.3.0147.
Molecular-based characterizations of Andean peoples are traditionally conducted in the service of elucidating continent-level evolutionary processes in South America. Consequently, genetic variation among "western" Andean populations is often represented in relation to variation among "eastern" Amazon and Orinoco River Basin populations. This west-east contrast in patterns of population genetic variation is typically attributed to large-scale phenomena, such as dual founder colonization events or differing long-term microevolutionary histories. However, alternative explanations that consider the nature and causes of population genetic diversity within the Andean region remain underexplored. Here we examine population genetic diversity in the Peruvian Central Andes using data from the mtDNA first hypervariable region and Y-chromosome short tandem repeats among 17 newly sampled populations and 15 published samples. Using this geographically comprehensive data set, we first reassessed the currently accepted pattern of western versus eastern population genetic structure, which our results ultimately reject: mtDNA population diversities were lower, rather than higher, within Andean versus eastern populations, and only highland Y-chromosomes exhibited significantly higher within-population diversities compared with eastern groups. Multiple populations, including several highland samples, exhibited low genetic diversities for both genetic systems. Second, we explored whether the implementation of Inca state and Spanish colonial policies starting at about ad 1400 could have substantially restructured population genetic variation and consequently constitute a primary explanation for the extant pattern of population diversity in the Peruvian Central Andes. Our results suggest that Peruvian Central Andean population structure cannot be parsimoniously explained as the sole outcome of combined Inca and Spanish policies on the region's population demography: highland populations differed from coastal and lowland populations in mtDNA genetic structure only; highland groups also showed strong evidence of female-biased gene flow and/or effective sizes relative to other Peruvian ecozones. Taken together, these findings indicate that population genetic structure in the Peruvian Central Andes is considerably more complex than previously reported and that characterizations of and explanations for genetic variation may be best pursued within more localized regions and defined time periods.
基于分子层面的安第斯人群特征分析传统上是为了阐明南美洲大陆层面的进化过程。因此,“西部”安第斯人群之间的遗传变异通常是相对于“东部”亚马逊和奥里诺科河流域人群之间的变异来呈现的。这种人群遗传变异模式中的东西部差异通常归因于大规模现象,如双重奠基者殖民事件或不同的长期微观进化历史。然而,考虑安第斯地区内人群遗传多样性的性质和成因的其他解释仍未得到充分探索。在这里,我们利用来自17个新采样人群和15个已发表样本的线粒体DNA第一高变区和Y染色体短串联重复序列的数据,研究了秘鲁中部安第斯地区的人群遗传多样性。利用这个地理范围广泛的数据集,我们首先重新评估了目前被接受的西部与东部人群遗传结构模式,而我们的结果最终否定了这一模式:安第斯人群与东部人群相比,线粒体DNA人群多样性更低,而非更高,并且只有高地Y染色体在群体内多样性上显著高于东部群体。多个群体,包括几个高地样本,在这两种遗传系统中都表现出低遗传多样性。其次,我们探讨了大约公元1400年开始实施的印加国家和西班牙殖民政策是否可能极大地重塑了人群遗传变异,从而构成了秘鲁中部安第斯地区现存人群多样性模式的主要解释。我们的结果表明,秘鲁中部安第斯人群结构不能简单地解释为印加和西班牙政策对该地区人口统计学影响的唯一结果:高地人群仅在线粒体DNA遗传结构上与沿海和低地人群不同;高地群体相对于秘鲁其他生态区也显示出女性偏向的基因流动和/或有效规模的有力证据。综上所述,这些发现表明,秘鲁中部安第斯地区的人群遗传结构比以前报道的要复杂得多,对遗传变异的特征描述和解释可能最好在更局部的地区和特定的时间段内进行。