Hunley Keith, Gwin Kiela, Liberman Brendan
Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 31;11(8):e0161018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161018. eCollection 2016.
Our current understanding of pre-Columbian history in the Americas rests in part on several trends identified in recent genetic studies. The goal of this study is to reexamine these trends in light of the impact of post-Columbian admixture and the methods used to study admixture. The previously-published data consist of 645 autosomal microsatellite genotypes from 1046 individuals in 63 populations. We used STRUCTURE to estimate ancestry proportions and tested the sensitivity of these estimates to the choice of the number of clusters, K. We used partial correlation analyses to examine the relationship between gene diversity and geographic distance from Beringia, controlling for non-Native American ancestry (from Africa, Europe and East Asia), and taking into account alternative paths of migration. Principal component analysis and multidimensional scaling were used to investigate the relationships between Andean and non-Andean populations and to explore gene-language correspondence. We found that 1) European and East Asian ancestry estimates decline as K increases, especially in Native Canadian populations, 2) a north-south decline in gene diversity is driven by low diversity in Amazonian and Paraguayan populations, not serial founder effects from Beringia, 3) controlling for non-Native American ancestry, populations in the Andes and Mesoamerica have higher gene diversity than populations in other regions, and 4) patterns of genetic and linguistic diversity are poorly correlated. We conclude that patterns of diversity previously attributed to pre-Columbian processes may in part reflect post-Columbian admixture and the choice of K in STRUCTURE analyses. Accounting for admixture, the pattern of diversity is inconsistent with a north-south founder effect process, though the genetic similarities between Mesoamerican and Andean populations are consistent with rapid dispersal along the western coast of the Americas. Further, even setting aside the disruptive effects of European contact, gene-language congruence is unlikely to have ever existed at the geographic scale analyzed here.
我们目前对美洲前哥伦布时期历史的理解部分基于近期基因研究中发现的几种趋势。本研究的目的是根据后哥伦布时期混合的影响以及用于研究混合的方法,重新审视这些趋势。先前发表的数据包括来自63个群体中1046个人的645个常染色体微卫星基因型。我们使用STRUCTURE软件来估计祖先比例,并测试这些估计值对聚类数K选择的敏感性。我们使用偏相关分析来研究基因多样性与距白令陆桥地理距离之间的关系,控制非美洲原住民祖先(来自非洲、欧洲和东亚),并考虑替代的迁移路径。主成分分析和多维尺度分析用于研究安第斯和非安第斯群体之间的关系,并探索基因与语言的对应关系。我们发现:1)随着K值增加,欧洲和东亚祖先估计比例下降,尤其是在加拿大原住民群体中;2)基因多样性的南北下降是由亚马逊和巴拉圭群体中的低多样性驱动的,而非白令陆桥的连续奠基者效应;3)控制非美洲原住民祖先,安第斯和中美洲的群体比其他地区的群体具有更高的基因多样性;4)遗传和语言多样性模式的相关性较差。我们得出结论,先前归因于前哥伦布时期过程的多样性模式可能部分反映了后哥伦布时期的混合以及STRUCTURE分析中K值的选择。考虑到混合因素,多样性模式与南北奠基者效应过程不一致,尽管中美洲和安第斯群体之间的遗传相似性与沿美洲西海岸的快速扩散一致。此外,即使撇开欧洲接触的破坏影响不谈,基因与语言的一致性在此处分析的地理尺度上也不太可能曾经存在过。